summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/43/82d529a44d1cf01f418fb6d90552487ed65dbb
blob: 69cf6a5ad3f13e1285203eaa01bd19e691d92ec5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gronager@ceptacle.com>) id 1RtFLo-00048I-PN
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:22:36 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from 2508ds5-oebr.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.54.49]
	helo=mail.ceptacle.com)
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RtFLj-0006kS-3f for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:22:36 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.ceptacle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9D916A07A3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2012 10:22:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceptacle.com
Received: from mail.ceptacle.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (server.ceptacle.private [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id Fy9BXdHUVLHV
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2012 10:22:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [109.105.106.198] (unknown [109.105.106.198])
	by mail.ceptacle.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 634DD16A0795
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri,  3 Feb 2012 10:22:24 +0100 (CET)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:22:23 +0100
Message-Id: <83F45CA3-D54A-499A-8A20-922CDEE52993@ceptacle.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1RtFLj-0006kS-3f
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5.2 tag in github ??
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:22:36 -0000

Hi Gavin, others?

I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against =
the 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite =
some improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying =
signatures on early blocks).

However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.2 in github:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tags

Am I missing something, or wasn't that release tagged ?

What I am looking for in particular is the number "140700", the last =
block not to be verified - I can see this in:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/checkpoints.cpp

But I would like to be sure that this is also the number used in 0.5.2.

Thanks,

Michael=