1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
|
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B712483
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f169.google.com (mail-ua0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C541F1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:02:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n59so73000529uan.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=qSWTBOtO+ZTVCGzDRJDZpJz/WOdLJOsCVAGJFRTCej0=;
b=DxiYb3xhUtTlASxiV0m1RS6fmY4PrVTFuSYIX6dull8GeLvBRhJxFzrHjutpkYPHaw
MnGDT3SHlmZyEazt74hVmrSrsA+JyBIuQ3fLkouY3o20wYLjntR78WYBDnnNYljxIpqb
NWIAgVH5cgP9Uf1zFi/U7hKG70Hpz2dxR1+euvv2UYCNXobCU0kqldFbBe1oR69evWlL
afb845eO9d70XYqyb5CbCw2STW+yiReBWwq6gcEUZgzzN3afzJ9q9ybX960FaBgWq7Cy
PdNUo6Ddbw0GEQZIWL78WfCSYWIq5sLa2Vmt9OaKBx78IlmjozdKaaRty9DJJBNMXens
wyEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=qSWTBOtO+ZTVCGzDRJDZpJz/WOdLJOsCVAGJFRTCej0=;
b=IaMLBj+SURL3xiOi3n/sCSLtOhIrEMnnPeucR46EJSUsXmXyx8E1lJ1+hhdQJz89+o
YKHz59noPmgvCueuyw0DtwrRGmn/p08or6hOLt026+kDE6rSkBhhDVmiuKOV5fng6EmN
sQYQ87RYYVj5Ganlcf6xrnwCN7vK1rZsc1/syFdTElR42G5CnlEp5v+JyjSPk/JSuzjP
X+UshbWfgFcu9qe5BoJTXN46EWxKv34GedGfqEu0xfGxwbeMMDrX/W0+Er7lCSiapBFi
ksfV8OIFhTZRKCR161y2goYpe/8PQtUE2zJ68NlITD5rjJzeXWLqcRiwV2tJRJl89D+a
iQYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOTctWRU3HSw6u1dzTBgV6ytf7Xq1SlMUCAwRimCUlFiK7oXDSWtxMIqHtq5ivALQjHbhQPh3iL/aLEEQ==
X-Received: by 10.159.38.73 with SMTP id 67mr4203038uag.136.1472115748153;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.51.77 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.51.77 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-Hjueu2-ShSGCTVF10x4yW5LUV1jv60SfY0rcGe149p5GA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201608232012.12588.luke@dashjr.org>
<90bf12f2-e109-28b4-e93e-54bbc8002cb4@electrum.org>
<57BDACB2.9040307@jonasschnelli.ch>
<278c940d-4b3b-2b8a-1aa5-f0991f1e6c8e@gmail.com>
<57BEA0B0.3090308@jonasschnelli.ch>
<756a4e04-c42d-cd61-794d-59f159c109b5@electrum.org>
<57BEA775.4020701@jonasschnelli.ch> <57BEA866.5070801@jonasschnelli.ch>
<CAJna-Hjueu2-ShSGCTVF10x4yW5LUV1jv60SfY0rcGe149p5GA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:02:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBidFN7o4HSFqL_MXnSU9vhQFo2bDorPu_MiZWutcV4ecw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114950dc3cae27053ae1a885
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Status updates (including to Active/Final
Status) - BIP 39, BIP 43, BIP 44, BIP 67, BIP 111, BIP 125, BIP 130
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:02:33 -0000
--001a114950dc3cae27053ae1a885
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
This is not the place to discuss the merits and/or issues of these BIPs,
only whether they should be treated as final.
On Aug 25, 2016 10:51, "Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge
> people don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds
> in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all
> points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as
> final, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns.
>
> slush
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not something we
>> > should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.
>>
>> Sorry. That was one "not" to many.
>>
>> </jonas>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--001a114950dc3cae27053ae1a885
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">This is not the place to discuss the merits and/or issues of=
these BIPs, only whether they should be treated as final.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Aug 25, 2016 1=
0:51, "Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev" <<a href=3D"mailto:bit=
coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</=
a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr">As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my=
knowledge people don't have any real world issues with that, including=
loading funds in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is pe=
rfect from all points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Le=
t's set it as final, and propose competing standards which cover all yo=
ur concerns.<div><br></div><div>slush</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"=
><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Sch=
nelli via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@l=
ists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.<wbr>linuxfou=
ndation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><=
br>
> The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not some=
thing we<br>
> should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.<br>
<br>
</span>Sorry. That was one "not" to many.<br>
<br>
</jonas><br>
<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundat<wbr>ion.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-d<wbr>ev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
--001a114950dc3cae27053ae1a885--
|
