1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 484B788A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:32:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com
[209.85.214.42])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18EF2167
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 203so116152647ith.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:32:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=thinlink-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=D9aA8rlh2TGYP05+8lsTiWoO9Us3GawgRy9ZFpc9m9k=;
b=kf2JEPi9N4+68Qn3YatHzRE7mimQCw4a42UV6uzz3NZFSG2WrRJBVqzkvOPVETdpaF
oTZ7eQxyj249rqSiJHucXhBry+71e3e07MG9sc8n8FrpKvEn0KhvkcAbHjoZChY9b34z
RUdXmoDr3ck2+gpIijvOAIcpN4v6F8femiHjARCiwodKyVVQZDrYnplAhhtrjuRPhq0j
EOrhSZSaKrF/SMy9FYhhaXAyvH5g7tC+FAlGm41zg7Qn3C5SoQSLX9URAUOe4Xn2a6Vo
+gzhEBL+lR/68TSxzKpZGujuS2DPLVj0D9DnqT2o9E25zjlVCFMc5PGwg01oIeKjrtuW
ddKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=D9aA8rlh2TGYP05+8lsTiWoO9Us3GawgRy9ZFpc9m9k=;
b=mNPKn8nTjp/+lcG2UeGBZ9aJa9SrpdxgpGo8aA9k6LqMXeVYwmtZNmyVrDD1g0HAj9
MUE9W+wRI8OC1v0dSD0KSXkjB17ZTTNvve3t8aTpAbCwCxBwPFoOGzoJ2NAFvI/Nb29e
DJPntCp9Nfavg6ANdtERieu2ok2/C4o29HCDWA94sd7goS+sd3kRA3lTc/TmqZzxkFNg
pagY4bRxbmgdc1+2hZr/lalS/H19TySIFwbpDKyzPlraw6wLTnvpVjSOsx9xy935mnH1
p825Hk9l3P20mjV2mlmK8RzdGImTxoQYjp9sdECTQdUu7inAQ2ulvvNjnU6RSLr9tQBZ
7uRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKYupENxI9gVodmhRRiQoXb6hY8+xGjP+UJj5zcOZPDhFvMQrX54k8yg/OMm+wdHHW8
X-Received: by 10.36.6.211 with SMTP id 202mr18405294itv.54.1485372756835;
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.199.222.147] ([12.0.205.114])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
y71sm10825439itb.1.2017.01.25.11.32.34
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:32:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Johnson Lau <jl2012@xbt.hk>,
bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <A182F080-F154-4F05-B2F1-21B90E469267@xbt.hk>
<efad941b-ce3e-1c98-ca5b-51da66badc6c@thinlink.com>
<3F2FDFFC-A73B-4C0F-A7B2-8449332BE70E@xbt.hk>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <5276b225-0a90-8539-6024-17b74433cb29@thinlink.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:32:25 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3F2FDFFC-A73B-4C0F-A7B2-8449332BE70E@xbt.hk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:32:36 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Anti-transaction replay in a hardfork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:32:39 -0000
On 1/24/2017 8:03 PM, Johnson Lau wrote:
> it seems they are not the same: yours is opt-out, while mine is opt-in.
I missed this. So in fact you propose a self-defeating requirement on
the new network, which would force unmodified yet otherwise compatible
systems to change to support the new network at all. This is unlikely to
be included in new network designs.
I suggest that the opt-out bits proposal comes from a more realistic
position that would actually make sense for everyone.
|
