summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/41/7c9a8b0c435007626ef3a6ff06427d389b09a0
blob: 1339c186c22d85a150604a963281e1b9325f2a2c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Return-Path: <bram@bittorrent.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1891CB55
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE34F4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m27so4050642iti.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=bittorrent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=fFYBfQi+wDghbFIt3p59uWenIFm+YR8GlDU/mJ9cU6o=;
	b=f/Vm+NbXVwo8pwj3AGiQTgfv+pYq3nCe4pR6adMOY399/FO9dd+Z+3MFWoCdDUCVwX
	pXrsPlSLmVYF5FBW0b3cy4NpaINLuwTUdPa1Baw3Ipv4aa99L4zS5nqBGFefuh4E2N6C
	39FzJUjjz0XHMHH8UUo88TZGwNR2E0WCtddZRzzWBpRKt5yYggka0lQqNw9eCS1aFNdD
	GAI072P57o5gKTRfOPsDmAC0ZBN+o9TP+ISWNMkIZvVFq+cnaI2r2bPXWZLh7lADF2oF
	XMHXtpB7EogPgv+QJQEZ1SDcfjzosBhsOKTe7FgMA9aMCTAOTNtvvkMFvlv6f6QwWOX9
	BS9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=fFYBfQi+wDghbFIt3p59uWenIFm+YR8GlDU/mJ9cU6o=;
	b=QhS/7jq89gDZ1FO6szudWxFJkRC0RyK77aMHZGdEKhW/cYWlAgUXacS734I9IvM5tX
	DAZnMfFkXxGfr3MsnizDn+lbUbgPwUwkcDXqQQXYkXYGKyrHC+isWwBCkWCQJEFZWuOp
	CajYg7dU98xhTm9l34SuKRAXF4ltyt/uo7HQh5ZQf/Zbfva8FY1qB/jILrGY0eW4c1cr
	VLnIwK9E56khBqRNYw45v5xbK77Dp9JaOYA+Rz5Vcj2hMlC3VPDqQ0jkyRQzJKhF6MtF
	SC+7GCtS74X0/TfQiwPAzwQC7HQULTDl6V84k7g6MiwjxdfUKb3TjfGti0h7qd7vtH+e
	lwtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2RidCi+Oa+r03Po8dnyCEAyieyRkrMLdCf+27OM+imrMLjHj1/dj0k4XAG5xoK2ww4npKu6VatHxhs/VtU
X-Received: by 10.36.1.147 with SMTP id 141mr7619172itk.65.1489341610540; Sun,
	12 Mar 2017 11:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.254.132 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFaEF9KJD7rVOALiaN6uNNzcL_u8V8uX2BLiNaTJUk98pqot=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFaEF9KJD7rVOALiaN6uNNzcL_u8V8uX2BLiNaTJUk98pqot=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bram Cohen <bram@bittorrent.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:00:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+KqGkq6K060cXfYqCekb9g2HNEeFDGL+_R2TfMF8crUHyBJSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ashish khandekar <contashk18@gmail.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143d464a55856054a8c5d0c
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Solution for blockchain congestion and
 determination of block size by bitcoin network/protocol itself.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:00:13 -0000

--001a1143d464a55856054a8c5d0c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Shouldn't there be a FAQ about this? All the blocksize increase proposals
going back to the Bitcoin Classic have the same problems and having
repeated proposals which move the details around a bit doesn't add anything
to the discussion.

--001a1143d464a55856054a8c5d0c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Shouldn&#39;t there be a FAQ about this? All the blocksize=
 increase proposals going back to the Bitcoin Classic have the same problem=
s and having repeated proposals which move the details around a bit doesn&#=
39;t add anything to the discussion.<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></=
div>

--001a1143d464a55856054a8c5d0c--