summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/40/08ca9e97a42c31423d13e22209af250dcd72db
blob: f36d9814a6db5e720db85ab425ae533e26fbea14 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A37A360
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:22:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ot0-f179.google.com (mail-ot0-f179.google.com
	[74.125.82.179])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0030726B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot0-f179.google.com with SMTP id y88so19233392ota.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=p8GtdFI5GCa1yvzRsrgcx6Jf7E2ZeQH5yrS/mKtE1ro=;
	b=H+Wf01CofSgBlz+qbFNMt00o1sqXOxbEl7omq5nVRKqX9mE+7lfF8C1dqCxrRqv9As
	J4XJgi9NWP8QxLkWY8F3ZUdj+QnTX9xRjP/CPRFiWqKzpjei5J17krCUU7D9TNUKTx6L
	d3hRyVd9WPo8DazAMAKkmDxvLS8Kpq+maNAjUiDHEhq9evsMMqCr1bnwJ01ZnbXv0Ybj
	kG4+4m/gYud62Lv5KaSP/IMjm3xd5vEaUGUNFmmnZmPFmdUBtO5cD2eSsOH++1zKsAXO
	2/5ouhXUjuivV++UoaqxTNENyW9i+NLewzcWXk8Cb0KCchH8nmo1fgOdfM4c/rOZFJBC
	A/YQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=p8GtdFI5GCa1yvzRsrgcx6Jf7E2ZeQH5yrS/mKtE1ro=;
	b=ocqFTxWyTWSnwwT1mMelEmqeS1AUPS45wf/JfRZe1vpogV8gBMxA3TMfUa+EHG83Sp
	e5BOEqEzbNCmNvfKHXzMQHD2xDUqZEXj0TGEvcoqg1Dttm2pHp2YIm4mivIrZ6Km5Hw6
	vhip+wO9+W958ElNsMR7aGetRa3GgkUtf9h++ljl+V6YDUDhysk192JyESXsKTGCqnGf
	PZyl7qCmTDnljmefQMAqHuH7fOZtXD2kXodpjKJN6lEYc0D3aU91DjLOz7IHGTz1iTHR
	SwEp+LEtM1AysHDMZMy3ZCp7cgizvZ5jWjQ3x5srcDZwI7JIn3wLQwrkbWuvOygnC16s
	Py5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H30nILrMtm0s3KOS5clavzkEW1lqJwRrioUjQXhqy2UnVgaU9s/QO3tLXAhEaKSQC6L/G41IYhcfgq8rQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.82.171 with SMTP id f43mr8848295oth.191.1490559740953;
	Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.36.111 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9EB5050D-E54E-4E8B-84C6-95CC1FAC4081@gmx.com>
References: <5b9ba6c4-6d8f-9c0b-2420-2be6c30f87b5@cannon-ciota.info>
	<35ba77db-f95a-4517-c960-8ad42a633ba0@gmail.com>
	<f4849cef-3c40-31a4-e323-6a731bb52bc2@cannon-ciota.info>
	<9C2A6867-470D-4336-8439-17F4E0CA4B17@gmx.com>
	<CAPWm=eV2aLJKMM_5T-jaXCm1umRFxy+vfirBqCGAvUKHtOphQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<9EB5050D-E54E-4E8B-84C6-95CC1FAC4081@gmx.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:22:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBayb-FAt0XOX9u+T3-Z2gJQAV-Y7xZS_k6YG74VhPqejQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f4030437965ce04d79054ba7fb63
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, 
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Defending against empty or near empty blocks from
 malicious miner takeover?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:22:24 -0000

--f4030437965ce04d79054ba7fb63
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> With a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has not
> upgraded will not produce a minority branch; instead they will simply have
> any invalid blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a wake-up call to
> upgrade.
>

False. With bip9-based soft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner blocks
will not be orphaned unless they are intentionally segwit-invalid (which
they currently are not). If you have told miners otherwise, let me know.

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507

--f4030437965ce04d79054ba7fb63
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid=
;padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div>With =
a tightening of the rule set, a hash power minority that has not upgraded w=
ill not produce a minority branch; instead they will simply have any invali=
d blocks they produce orphaned, serving as a wake-up call to upgrade.</div>=
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>False. With bip9-based s=
oft-fork-based activation of segwit, miner blocks will not be orphaned unle=
ss they are intentionally segwit-invalid (which they currently are not). If=
 you have told miners otherwise, let me know.</div><div><br></div></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature">- Bryan<br><=
a href=3D"http://heybryan.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://heybryan.org/</a><=
br>1 512 203 0507</div>
</div></div>

--f4030437965ce04d79054ba7fb63--