1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C87CEEE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:41:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com
[209.85.220.46])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8452C0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so32303894pac.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:reply-to:user-agent
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=RHXxlAi3DsoRvbBrmHp5/qSAm52cGxd/f4Fr2JKvGj0=;
b=x/DUPWN9DfA5mgq07G5FDYEKp39pB4uDIK5dHgEnKAGqR/oLkpAPQFZcbS9yUlJIVP
y8Peh6oEDPsxg5y2dsqY1ocGS8fKtf9I+dsTtPUH3tYvqkk33phWMMBEYfRv5Dp6bC5F
imV1vWD8/3St0ofXiVd10IRSigw3S5P36HbKWFGnSHfHuWD6az42X9ngqQdpHDeMNA0g
57xa73kfQDEn84hask/6FhKwfYpcHBJOIxRtgMBqY1y8qnOyQUS070F79/ZCC2XkL8ab
L0KeqF6k8lbjCwPtG/QL9uOH4tnSqZOhOnGT2Fn5kOS+Avx46Ck+JoxsKlquWYFC59mg
Tuug==
X-Received: by 10.68.100.226 with SMTP id fb2mr11250208pbb.92.1441392115096;
Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
[76.167.237.202])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qh2sm3321394pbc.7.2015.09.04.11.41.53
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo@gmail.com>
To: "Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell@gmail.com>, "Bitcoin Dev"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:52 +0000
Message-Id: <em4118a7e8-3bd6-45e8-bce1-6c7c2d57e254@platinum>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.23181.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
request assignment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:57 -0000
I think it's a reasonable approach. Once the number is assigned, the=20
change is made and the pull request is updated.
Only thing is it would be nice to be able to indicate which pull=20
requests are number requests and which pull requests are ready for=20
merging. Perhaps we should make a special label for number requests.
- Eric
------ Original Message ------
From: "Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev"=20
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Bitcoin Dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: 9/3/2015 4:18:08 PM
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for=20
request assignment
>The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
>storing and presenting BIPs.
>
>I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
>to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
>the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to
>request number assignment.
>
>Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?
>
>(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly
>directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different
>subject. Thanks!)
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
