1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <chauhanansh.me@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F414C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A77D83F55
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7A77D83F55
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Nu1AlOqj
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id PHQeNuvhKNIc
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:26:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 85C54831A2
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C54831A2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:26:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id w16so6961708ilh.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 01:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=VPOPAK18f0n609Sw1gC2aC3zeB/7DBwq5IUlQm2IHeA=;
b=Nu1AlOqjzblxGNF1V4i0AVWzhr3TUERnOUBWAkM0bgAeqJsB7wSbyLWYFOfOviwcJK
qjFFoRZnVD+Bbg3pHBfDHT9wWyND7OfXNdACIy7P4SvAjDsbuHfOP8EuhPwkdIgr61i6
gCMfTtpJN75kEnuyTZLD0eExKUtra8NLZDgAI0kRyn5vp5Qx39IAopV4LjtKK5NDZQSM
aDYARhyJE28WzInA0T+pts+CuhHQftRF99ra5jHwlmcJBYJ428d0AFf6wO4k5B7tNFhH
LDyBEiIGbeutTlntXuVQV4steqfhhCffRANPgCb+CaNoR+JXt5HUA7jZk7B5roN2p8+Q
ma0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id
:subject:to;
bh=VPOPAK18f0n609Sw1gC2aC3zeB/7DBwq5IUlQm2IHeA=;
b=BChfejMz1eXIIPVocvX5xipQbv3yKycWItbaXwMsTJ9tiOXwWTcZE2YW3RdxpnG6OE
0eD8Hl0ZFRAH2BNHVS4DJaxTPEI/vRowGp6iKN6E6kkydTKcD5765MrrYQhtCVhHzULD
IaqF0zZD1hvSiz/9MEH8n1543HDs8wlApla062MuLLOl9Ga0FwrS5Y4OgMwnHsb8+AXN
UuXdQnTHNR4dR8N8oFsGzFP/ZGncuFfYIRX5JoXDDqn4jKzNYuj1V4ZUOR0Gv13fHQ4k
rs6/p1QDAMrTS50stVKY6WnbV70P8TbexTJKQp3qGgxdj3ivTCuZM6yl2A/SEHGxIDkQ
covg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+SbaxBsjQcDuE9uiZESOHie1Qaq8NoQSIBsPYNy3QKQPjk1nge
yvJn1APwR8BPaog9aKMhEsObQjL2I3rj+qDEOnCbvpc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tb4NgoZZfZjl/szEssoMjBpx/qoBMA7SnRd+tpQTjFzuW61b3AS9vswHZB4s64GgE2MtBxgNU/UoHn2XM3Pvc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a67:b0:2dc:43d9:51ba with SMTP id
w7-20020a056e021a6700b002dc43d951bamr6292731ilv.180.1658823976387; Tue, 26
Jul 2022 01:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: aaradhya@technovanti.co.in
From: Aaradhya Chauhan <chauhanansh.me@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:56:05 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGHFe1BXdTkPZn4r_KTxYoz0sqcMsV830dm5JTTFURxDezBnDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000db8b2105e4b10dbf"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:57:05 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Regarding setting a lower minrelaytxfee
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:26:20 -0000
--000000000000db8b2105e4b10dbf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do
want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading
at much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection
measure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection
measure, and should be lowered slightly. Even if not, it should be lowered
to half when prices go double than today and keeps oscillating at that
point. As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just
needing support from full node operators. I support LN but I think
transaction affordability should remain constant in the future. If I'm okay
to wait in a queue, I should have the option for same affordability for
minimum fees in the future as it is today. (Like we still have posts today
while email still exists).
Awaiting your response.
Regards
Aaradhya Chauhan
--000000000000db8b2105e4b10dbf
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I know this might be a sort of repetition for a previous question, but I do=
want to know from enthusiasts in this group that while Bitcoin was trading=
at much lower price in its early days, 1 sat/vB was a good dust protection=
measure. But now, I think it's a bit high for merely a dust protection=
measure, and should be lowered slightly. Even if not, it should be lowered=
to half when prices go double than today and keeps oscillating at that poi=
nt. As it's not a consensus rule, I think it can be done easily, just n=
eeding support from full node operators. I support LN but I think transacti=
on affordability should remain constant in the future. If I'm okay to w=
ait in a queue, I should have the option for same affordability for minimum=
fees in the future as it is today. (Like we still have posts today while e=
mail still exists).<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Awaiting y=
our response.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards</d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto">Aaradhya Chauhan</div>
--000000000000db8b2105e4b10dbf--
|
