1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B753EC002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6744784177
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 6744784177
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=SK4LL6Co
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id OXIKRmZBa3wB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1601583E2E
Received: from new3-smtp.messagingengine.com (new3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.229])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1601583E2E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7099958018B;
Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:04:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:04:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm3; t=1665759897; x=1665767097; bh=2/Zu8su/wGfJhkhmEL0EcIxdaAkE
fNbuEJbPksu0YAw=; b=SK4LL6Co84+H+OCBr1BGtQZTsGnOCQclV9jA4taI46CJ
RDLZvdPW2Bl/5gDfQYbsPqBNZUtvULFVcYUdzuy9e1TfxP1QsWP8ocYojmrLNpUm
VrXpOfQUmTb7df/eHcd3FEmm16WkZMtXG9P0lSmJIC8IsLVjB80D4lS5/wcFGcwE
ituR9oih8SHbX9gcEmYz/vW83Xi8grxndIyl+rbgI0YeQw/SXVXfSVnOj4Zk4dZa
tKDZqBHwRKiBbBt4+QtLH7r/ysY9AGHRCXe8v5DOJnb8ikc21kOEwJ1AmNuiwf5w
L8XwAW7am0b7aPE/LTtbHWJ60uBb3EHT5850MTBo3A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mXpJYyu8MoUO7lsWLiqFbgdSznmimaXC9QBxRCWG2bDtT6Uu41-Dew>
<xme:mXpJY3fcQlXuRwiPpgkLobFFl_4xBpXzbONBn3Du9n6VtHAySlRMYhQO4JjTcD1pQ
hiLwFoW69khQbcdTeI>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:mXpJY9wgn8aZaEAxYXLKdrzP2sNf8bPdmcNNBw0vBzPbufY7OQ0dpdN16w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfeekvddgkeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghr
ucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg
hrnhepiedvvdelieekjeeukefgtdelfeegheehleffueehteeghfelveejfeelgeevffef
necuffhomhgrihhnpehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg
eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdho
rhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mXpJY9MR-uBSrGshA13nExwLMuoDNNAwEgmZongll90wQLrGlAJmag>
<xmx:mXpJYy_tRBs5MyrvFOAeHwI8GdNvmllojUrtmtgrVWy3Pq6iD88lBg>
<xmx:mXpJY1XTq3Ow-aMjPKjWhAhQ1ecp2iz2A4ZhLdETclh4AmAMHuAthQ>
<xmx:mXpJY0LRyIgZXBzdAySbyZmY65C91F1XjHk8DfaIskLb6IdBVP4lww>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
14 Oct 2022 11:04:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 886F45F86C; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:04:56 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: John Carvalho <john@synonym.to>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y0l6mN5Qw20HSmg6@petertodd.org>
References: <mailman.7.1665662404.16405.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
<CAHTn92x8-20SjMRs=+vbtvbvocSUM9gVEmHkhuifXeApANFXfg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uzWu6mFOXkyC6rM2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHTn92x8-20SjMRs=+vbtvbvocSUM9gVEmHkhuifXeApANFXfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Opt-in full-RBF] Zero-conf apps in immediate
danger
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:10:49 -0000
--uzWu6mFOXkyC6rM2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 12:03:21PM +0200, John Carvalho via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
> In support of Dario's concern, I feel like there is a degree of gaslighti=
ng
> happening with the advancement of RBF somehow being okay, while merchants
> wanting to manage their own 0conf risk better being not okay.
The way merchants try to manage 0conf risk is quite harmful to Bitcoin.
Connecting to large numbers of nodes to try to risk-manage propagation _is_=
an
attack, albeit a mild one. Everyone doing that is very harmful; only a few
merchants being able to do it is very unfair/centralized.
=2E..and of course, in the past this has lead to merchants trying to make d=
eals
with miners directly, even going as far as to suggest reorging out
double-spends. I don't need to explain why that is obviously extremely harm=
ful.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--uzWu6mFOXkyC6rM2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0RcYcKRzsEwFZ3N5Lly11TVRLzcFAmNJepIACgkQLly11TVR
LzcUsw/+J0RjfX6NlTDp4zLpaQiCA54/Evl1Iw/gyVAAjmV6+U9wymMp6MmWIStQ
Us5h1DxxVnvxeZo/RHytLldPgqXJOtfQsCGsTeCqPh8m2k3oTZsnNhynjwFUxJ/1
Osg638cJvu1SfxWjTXfIU3PNDT1Ab4+q3jvqgAPZs+RcFjEylZm2zNBl6oxRqceQ
akRrZh2kjJIddiSl5t1vd75GUku9Gj9jLfuY2w07v0M9kLfwa1b/0zYjaZzkIW0s
0SlTynFoO52FJ8R+8ZGKjOC2JhDYzN4c22SkSOReUCxrlkj8GrqgKXnTddIkunR0
1KDSNsvDQgHEXASuRWTR7OxA+uEpt8w3ABAXtgF35aY8dkOT4hRn5GOmKL0EyJ1I
roPdTRudua35mwV7XTM9CHKYd0dnk/qxX1kP+FOnkGC/SwUo8GIJSULixyDCbfHh
E2SzTwF1Wrhh0HHpBW2hLjLDZiN54EdA7FVY/dMvWpiwZdO+HlF0NLV8O8j8QYJ+
Wg9qTieIiL9bwgKvlW9mtIZRijYXWSWql4gGXhDMncjQoBw2cv5iVzt5cg+WRDsF
VsNlhLue5nqIrF/4HjttPfNUC6sLPM0JZaJ/JgIPficD5VmsOVuw1axM0cFFz3ot
aCtwO9tY/66jgH2r8aPqB4fYylvII/EDSUY8Qbo2c3X49k1UM9E=
=nQ8p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--uzWu6mFOXkyC6rM2--
|
