1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <wendel@314t.com>) id 1UykQH-0006Mt-G6
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UykQF-0002ZS-JW
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0000
Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jc3so4741305bkc.28
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=733TH98kVt2eGU71TCD563iyflwR/j/HY7rHZnBVZ+M=;
b=GIFsJr5PvbvvJ6L3UG4KtQekFCa7J/yRq5URCIFHwi/1BsuRKCSvMrRG65DBZHhbUg
o0lsWccBLGQVKmDCOAlsS4IKOv0qzffQEUoHnIskYUjkO4ymgVcD5l+ULaUy13SDDD2l
jpI0Kf1NWWrV8+5yp/n+6lNdyBZ8jURpKpzwu+PFbMy4F5wH7IH+A/4lBgeCUNam5Ubl
ODmHJBXfqPfA1gSC8eXKu8y6A4oFktHB3YRV4VJZVGpMMcAM4oVEaFJSGqWsGyyLb/oT
eZDf+hRV+livxH80+rrbBD9rDuIGXtR4YjJl7Gc/vDNm7BpxbtlvFoiOQwHrK8khNWb8
O0dg==
X-Received: by 10.204.228.139 with SMTP id je11mr7971573bkb.83.1373899438534;
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (spftor5e1.privacyfoundation.ch. [77.109.139.26])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
eu16sm12338150bkc.0.2013.07.15.07.43.55 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: w grabhive <wendel@314t.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Wendell <w@grabhive.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2xh=m8yWLt-o2UrrUVfU+cUYBuMVxkVFF5mVMtWdRwOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:39:30 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1727B41-AF61-44FA-BE17-5FE4425FDEA8@grabhive.com>
References: <B87F1213-5BD8-43F5-9744-F69947561ED5@grabhive.com>
<CANEZrP2xh=m8yWLt-o2UrrUVfU+cUYBuMVxkVFF5mVMtWdRwOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1JY54mmRmjhWX8tuo+op37jUS0bZDc6Bx/h4afcuv3l6crYrRmw2/TB6y4HLH49MguDYi
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1UykQF-0002ZS-JW
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Introducing BitcoinKit.framework
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:10:45 -0000
Hi Mike,
You are absolutely right about the synchronize time, it's one of our =
main frustration points right now and we clearly won't deliver the kind =
of user experience we want, without fixing this. Actually we were =
thinking of extending Jeff Garzik's picocoin as time permits, but the =
plan is far from concrete at the moment.
What you say about trans-piling bitcoinj is _really_ appealing. We =
discounted Java simply because an OS X JVM is no longer guaranteed, but =
otherwise bitcoinj is ideal for our purposes. How can we assist or =
otherwise accelerate such an effort?
-w
On Jul 15, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> That's great! I'm all for more wallets, especially user friendly UIs.
>=20
> However being based on bitcoind means it will take a very long time to =
synchronize for new users. We know a lot of users drop out. The best fix =
for this is SPV mode. Do you have any plans in this direction?
>=20
> So far, the only SPV mode implementation I know about is bitcoinj. I =
am experimenting with trans-piling bitcoinj to C++ to make it usable =
from Objective-C++ exactly with your use case in mind.
|
