summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/36/a03055db2eca61ef8f63878a8fe394409a8be9
blob: df8582c049a2a575a5e734216b022bb32ae3e64d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bip@mattwhitlock.name>) id 1WTxGj-00023X-32
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:42:09 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1WTxGh-0007Vx-QZ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:42:09 +0000
Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36])
	by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id jTCi1n0040mv7h055Vi2fZ; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:42:02 +0000
Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:6:4800:47f:219:d1ff:fe75:dc2f])
	by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id jVi11n00a4VnV2P3XVi2F0; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:42:02 +0000
From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Roy Badami <roy@gnomon.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:42:01 -0400
Message-ID: <8171920.tjDNGQmgQK@crushinator>
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.12.13-gentoo; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20140329172815.GH62995@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
References: <CACsn0ckScTWG4YxNCscxvtdsmcUkxtR2Gi-rdBs2HCkirPz5rA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5336FBE7.7030209@gmail.com>
	<20140329172815.GH62995@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WTxGh-0007Vx-QZ
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Presenting a BIP for Shamir's Secret
	Sharing of Bitcoin private keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:42:09 -0000

On Saturday, 29 March 2014, at 5:28 pm, Roy Badami wrote:
> Right now there are also people simply taking base58-encoded private
> keys and running them through ssss-split.
> 
> It has a lot going for it, since it can easily be reassembled on any
> Linux machine without special software (B Poettering's Linux command
> line SSSS implementation[1] seems to be included in most Linux distros).
> 
> roy
> 
> [1] http://point-at-infinity.org/ssss/

Respectfully, it's also possible to take a base58-encoded private key and run it through GPG, which is included in most Linux distros. But yet we have BIP38.