blob: 5986e51b2259da4d2fb62f0eefc1c13b799dbda6 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7974949F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D94467
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:44:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81CB938A0070;
Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:43:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:171001:mark@friedenbach.org::rKtRU+ncghIUmfI0:bPklK
X-Hashcash: 1:25:171001:roconnor@blockstream.io::EcArDCXSpRD6YidL:DHtM
X-Hashcash: 1:25:171001:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::+An6+ywuxm9zx6Bs:dSQyd
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:43:18 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.12.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.34; x86_64; ; )
References: <201710010113.30518.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAMZUoK=heF1FALyGbi7cpzLiQuhLnsq-5Z2-sTgq5b28sjjeUw@mail.gmail.com>
<BC800737-7B93-41BD-BA87-F25B25F95426@friedenbach.org>
In-Reply-To: <BC800737-7B93-41BD-BA87-F25B25F95426@friedenbach.org>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="gb18030"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201710012043.18742.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Version 1 witness programs (first draft)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 20:44:27 -0000
On Sunday 01 October 2017 8:39:11 PM Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> What about an optional commitment to witness size in bytes? The value zero
> meaning =A1=B0I don=A1=AFt care.=A1=B1 I would argue that it should be a =
maximum however,
> and therefor serialized as part of the witness. The serialization of this
> would be very compact (1 plus the difference between actual and maximum,
> with zero meaning not used.)
Could just do SIGHASH_WITNESS_SIZE in addition to SIGHASH_WITNESS_DEPTH...
|
