1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
|
Return-Path: <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BA2E7C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 2 Jun 2018 22:02:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16701108
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 2 Jun 2018 22:02:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id j15-v6so8139180wme.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 02 Jun 2018 15:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to
:references; bh=3HLeGjlq2Hjg/OVqXl189ycBkkRvgrFz+4CxAUxu6A4=;
b=jrF5Kbf9tzJwMcMuNWjWQItkICj1j+2KgoNLrSBECHwndTAEsr9akCcAIeNow67npq
kmXcJhK6tolPGW1HH9RgeXNuR/A3PKDe6tNbgNKFp+mjcHZx50uoTV5vi95mbEzrNwer
AeDMOKw8GO+Y7X0k6l4OFToT9LST9bEPVVl9GDWIZFkSIYnIMtHjIc6PCZKDvKRZYn+g
hEB/W64KCSjQKMFS4kD//y+0PDosef1EyXDOPVQ7m/A/GkWSovYjwFIu4hU02Ax+FWrW
+SdUcCDvYETWzdTC7l9YmlRcIfqKN2y0/dQ/0WepXUqZLlAyeHqvALNRMBHPGp18vjem
Tm9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date
:in-reply-to:cc:to:references;
bh=3HLeGjlq2Hjg/OVqXl189ycBkkRvgrFz+4CxAUxu6A4=;
b=kAi7vMhJXZ1+Ul3hPdI3bTOtZM7nUx+u372fXBWB4qScHY/3ZC30RG3lQVJcSiaxXi
xthSdQaBKG9xz/4Z43Nz4zQeyI76TTdYf6dD9ZQNzKzGmriZEu0KlPxq2dWX5VOUi7Av
I74syAwNquhpVh633b1F3Iv3euMF96fZUlszUUENokcPDIE6YFO7vc63I8hxK8DZHimj
f3W67cltVX7SoW/sx6twWnn9fac2i2uijE+6KUmVwfAHFBaero0E4vqFos/3ZHk8z0nt
a0IhCvswar4nYFBfEPvVwfHJWgMQL1TXOREynwb2iNgpj67aq/fJwaMEPygJ8G/HI2Io
4k3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcbrAM/950RoaqiUP+0Ga5mHQvim9R3GHdiH5RD88LTe5e/qSM2
LfHGelEbQmllULlLdPXAY+Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK5QBTAyTLO3XPK74uXna88tG/hXsYsP7heqWPq8U6tJgvbrfawaa2eh5yZZTbNvcQ0BNJ8Kw==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:db8c:: with SMTP id
p12-v6mr18016953edk.298.1527976934698;
Sat, 02 Jun 2018 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.54.109.146] ([88.128.80.153])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
f11-v6sm16032257ede.45.2018.06.02.15.02.12
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 02 Jun 2018 15:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <343A3542-3103-42E9-95B7-640DFE958FFA@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_C03E14EE-DD9A-4D54-87CA-8CD8EBF9977D";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 00:02:11 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20180602124157.744x7j4u7dqtaa43@email>
To: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <7E4FA664-BBAF-421F-8C37-D7CE3AA5310A@gmail.com>
<F87D7069-0FDC-4572-B02B-398A2A455935@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgT716PiP0ucoASxryM9y+s9H2z06Z0ToaP1xT3BozAtNw@mail.gmail.com>
<CADZtCSguto2z6Z9CykymxnCokqo1G=sW0Ov0ht+KcD+KMnYyow@mail.gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs-YDzfRqmyJ85wTH0ciccjCvkm5stGyP_tVGGna=PMv3A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs9p5COiS_7Jbj1r2iAKTEdXUcnVTRzL27c3=CeuB9WDTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSyVi0d_ixp-auRPPzPfFeffN=hsWhWT5=EzDO3O+Ue1g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs_0qCZbRCfL8EJw6gzWjZeXWcJrtg27g_SJ7+PkYTHg6A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTs+aKyiL8Kg_AZk=Mdh6896MEg=KHa6ANAZO7unsGEsg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADZtCShyYbgKk2zsKzQniqDw--XKfYWTk3Hk3o50V=MgT6zeuQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20180602124157.744x7j4u7dqtaa43@email>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:55:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 158 Flexibility and Filter Size
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:02:16 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_C03E14EE-DD9A-4D54-87CA-8CD8EBF9977D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Without block commitment mobiles would have to use trusted filter =
provider or implement a complex data hungry algorithm and still remain =
as insecure as with BIP 37.
Years of experience implementing wallets with BIP 37 taught us that an =
outpoint + output script filter is useful. Committing such a filter to =
the block can not be an error.
We could roll this out on P2P prior to a soft fork adding the =
commitment, but I would not expect its use to pick up before that.
Therafter BIP 37 could be rightfully decommissioned, herby offering both =
security and privacy enhancement at modest data cost.
Tamas Blummer
> On Jun 2, 2018, at 14:41, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 07:02:38PM -0700, Jim Posen via bitcoin-dev =
wrote:
>> Without the ability to verify filter validity, a client would have to =
stop
>> syncing altogether in the presence of just one malicious peer, which =
is
>> unacceptable.
>=20
> I'm confused about why this would be the case. If Alice's node
> generates filters accurately and Mallory's node generates filters
> inaccurately, and they both send their filters to Bob, won't Bob be =
able
> to download any blocks either filter indicates are relevant to his
> wallet?
--Apple-Mail=_C03E14EE-DD9A-4D54-87CA-8CD8EBF9977D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE6YNJViYMM6Iv5f9e9nKRxRdxORwFAlsTE+MACgkQ9nKRxRdx
ORw9Egf/Q+Wrzfz2DaUMOYGoQMmRfPVtNwTnPjespySulOzavCIyaGboUohgFfBq
GY6OtWkaLnZeI36H9F/en4v2retRtSF1JH3oI4AifN+lRZHrRqOvDKCcmbCWbDfk
u4cDk2PZ8FaP/og/OYvXYw0lHz/j/SkUB25pKhs2xHXC72Ct9VdBEwYLNYcnwE9q
/1WmL2b6AIi3kQsrRSkd0flZB6rh0zmKM40cSXU6WexDJ/N+oWg4eV7stYk5PIvs
EOupcPr8G6f+W9po8Hwt9HiQfcT0Q9qBDfbSqfc3CKRedCapZzrE7zuhiyIIQ0zB
jt0115n94InSL2GUpYV+1Tr14bu4+w==
=6jsr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_C03E14EE-DD9A-4D54-87CA-8CD8EBF9977D--
|
