summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/32/0df0316bdd15779c582f3dbdb62268f5e7b1f4
blob: d682f9611143f87557cfb604878526653a3c01f6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F5EC92B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:21:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (mail-vk0-f42.google.com
	[209.85.213.42])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6CC1BB
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id x75so159105379vke.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:21:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=atsrMOuC2hE32VVQSekefIDDsxe1kHLUgYh1JQCbTbM=;
	b=NxwhRTrOs5stkGs3CBxf7J2kiZYdDl/1yeFVkLHWyhqjsiE0lSidEh4KBGf+q78Cc1
	BdX1hCzlNoy+2UKVJ6EiujiJMkBAcQO4PZuFE2J8BzQcTc33deIZwzgbe80opFQVda3g
	YdPstX0H2+JcpMq7okU/x3YAPRMDjg/rjhCTJYuJAFJDgwRtSVUMOepDf1r2TLV6iKZy
	Ze8IoJynoXxNpYViKDqszOcUu8Bm9ftT8z5t834aP4rZcmEa55CyWm16S3cRN5Qtkfaf
	aw8ijdHZN9NadQPqyNU8LrHP9t3dyHUqtuBruVWzVK75Xt2U4O5rU302c3lZd0eRwcPJ
	025Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=atsrMOuC2hE32VVQSekefIDDsxe1kHLUgYh1JQCbTbM=;
	b=XzvU5SkIuaL8Kp0QegJsUSm/FZzrGC9FI8gwjnwjDr0CGm9MzB+VXIZ+Ves8EKMkcq
	5fIzZfqnBhzeXjmJ4c8yLzy1BDUjXX7DdEVbf4zFQR18ajt516PZ41YTnSbAx3Qs+cIF
	xyMSWazWTMTXIPGyEbjPxbU6PXoBUJKl3mNJ6ieKZNwT1o27Q26UXfcYTqxE+PO27kut
	D36lR/KvQ5X8Iy+lgCEfPhDjBDXLhoQ1WpEAAtHiN0w5ehQle1tUGf67ubg7659eYVNa
	zENXuOjuykZxqH2pCQCe/1ET1rwona9/4WcGVkT2R8+yHdv6e8LJOva3hkuSeexN/toh
	c8lQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI5sWs9S5PFhFu02TuNWNCkEehW2SCKA2+J99gBQV+dkTgrHHkdeW8Anbf4BcCgeC/Jmb56twSuEQIX6g==
X-Received: by 10.31.231.193 with SMTP id e184mr1621335vkh.16.1485451298239;
	Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:21:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.44.198 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:21:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <93ac7433-470c-d59e-e085-29f0f1613676@mattcorallo.com>
References: <A182F080-F154-4F05-B2F1-21B90E469267@xbt.hk>
	<93ac7433-470c-d59e-e085-29f0f1613676@mattcorallo.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:21:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0PcbMxjfBJZYveQayhTUb1C3YNZCEMA1T=f9mAfxHypg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>, 
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c095ce4f67df0054702946d
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, 
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:58:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Anti-transaction replay in a hardfork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:21:39 -0000

--94eb2c095ce4f67df0054702946d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> To maximize fork divergence, it might make sense to require this. Any
> sensible proposal for a hard fork would include a change to the sighash
> anyway, so might as well make it required, no?
>

Compatibility with existing transaction-signing software and hardware
should be considered.

I think any hard fork proposal should support a reasonable number of
reasonable-size old-sighash transactions, to allow a smooth transaction of
wallet software and hardware and to support anybody who might have a
hardware wallet locked away in a safe deposit box for years.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--94eb2c095ce4f67df0054702946d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_b=
lank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><block=
quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc=
 solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D":1m6" class=3D"a3s aXjCH m159d8d262b0da=
180">To maximize fork divergence, it might make sense to require this. Any<=
br>
sensible proposal for a hard fork would include a change to the sighash<br>
anyway, so might as well make it required, no?</div></blockquote></div><br>=
Compatibility with existing transaction-signing software and hardware shoul=
d be considered.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gm=
ail_extra">I think any hard fork proposal should support a reasonable numbe=
r of reasonable-size old-sighash transactions, to allow a smooth transactio=
n of wallet software and hardware and to support anybody who might have a h=
ardware wallet locked away in a safe deposit box for years.</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-=
smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div d=
ir=3D"ltr"><div>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div><div><br></div></div></div></=
div></div></div>
</div></div>

--94eb2c095ce4f67df0054702946d--