1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
|
Return-Path: <marek@palatinus.cz>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E453894D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 283311E5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id q128so229623803wma.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=palatinus-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=jXYdNYQD53damt02Qk9McpAj9AQklHKPswOoIOvIOwk=;
b=AR1cSzWN9I6xXMPmoOKkxml8sXsq1/uBGyxx2ITykVka+TAgIQtUdzVPWIiSHt/e/p
ucd2o8g6DWCFCthd0Y/dF0RuvLjgeFNryK6M7OYjyBDn/22qe9sHNb73jvq6xKLFtw/2
T+sUHqf75OudjJ6zotk3dPAC1V3lkBI+J7Vj/hCr0BSgOJIgzwdP4i1Q8xyQw6RMGe2x
CVgVJRj4FL7WWWBPl9BZUWo+NqEISX/ai0ZGernWEu1xtnQLu9q6oo0FzrZsuO8lzbl3
9xCsvxFsCWyaWQbWJZu2Uj1aBQrsPoIPEApR9k3UV4mIT/of6AIsd+7b57d+ykHpP4f1
VUtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=jXYdNYQD53damt02Qk9McpAj9AQklHKPswOoIOvIOwk=;
b=ZknRzStUsgxLKse4H0wkZTE7IlDfvEpA2+SLbViwM7m/ms/YcwoSDQILc0DTjHBz8U
0z03Aq59xfLfoeDgcDivBYIzctgEX7lKiiVaNZYeNxsvu7bznMgsSyrQGasJGgSNo11v
i3VzhiOM6uVXQKZ8hi6Dlpkk6JdEbp2ktYtGnuxlQ344G2ejKdK2G+GwWJwmIybVQlo1
mzDjQ/rT6uod/38LKdyT80fzJW90kQ0GVbaqyQyAVOfMYp3EclRxUkeOkVtbpBLL7k9A
byK7CceqjNnAszWq1o6vV87cFqM18jpFNbm0udi9Xir6JQ0Wqou07XTjy4QxcKkmHtR6
cHnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousUV+VnAqD7dZnOIT4LJYao0YYSeVDI7lqGL0Pj/QlpL8eK0mvIaoLV2tDYhnH64GX2M7an9GgPJs331A==
X-Received: by 10.28.203.136 with SMTP id b130mr30379892wmg.13.1472115073767;
Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.43.135 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57BEA866.5070801@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <201608232012.12588.luke@dashjr.org>
<90bf12f2-e109-28b4-e93e-54bbc8002cb4@electrum.org>
<57BDACB2.9040307@jonasschnelli.ch>
<278c940d-4b3b-2b8a-1aa5-f0991f1e6c8e@gmail.com>
<57BEA0B0.3090308@jonasschnelli.ch>
<756a4e04-c42d-cd61-794d-59f159c109b5@electrum.org>
<57BEA775.4020701@jonasschnelli.ch> <57BEA866.5070801@jonasschnelli.ch>
From: Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus.cz>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:50:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hjueu2-ShSGCTVF10x4yW5LUV1jv60SfY0rcGe149p5GA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1309d60a8065053ae1809c
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Status updates (including to Active/Final
Status) - BIP 39, BIP 43, BIP 44, BIP 67, BIP 111, BIP 125, BIP 130
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:51:16 -0000
--94eb2c1309d60a8065053ae1809c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge
people don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds
in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all
points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as
final, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns.
slush
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not something we
> > should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.
>
> Sorry. That was one "not" to many.
>
> </jonas>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--94eb2c1309d60a8065053ae1809c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and=
to my knowledge people don't have any real world issues with that, inc=
luding loading funds in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44=
is perfect from all points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cas=
es. Let's set it as final, and propose competing standards which cover =
all your concerns.<div><br></div><div>slush</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_=
extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jon=
as Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin=
-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfo=
undation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span =
class=3D""><br>
> The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not some=
thing we<br>
> should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.<br>
<br>
</span>Sorry. That was one "not" to many.<br>
<br>
</jonas><br>
<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--94eb2c1309d60a8065053ae1809c--
|
