1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1YOJeG-0007zM-CN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:27:40 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
bitsofproof.com designates 80.237.132.66 as permitted sender)
client-ip=80.237.132.66; envelope-from=tamas@bitsofproof.com;
helo=wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de;
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YOJeF-0006Hp-29
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:27:40 +0000
Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.100]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1YOJe5-0006se-30; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:27:29 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C38D4F5-48B3-46ED-A969-9C7EB9979745";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEF57CF9-5AFC-465B-ABA7-1B53118D6A5E@bitsofproof.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:27:27 +0100
Message-Id: <58035812-A271-419C-B039-869B364B6912@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CABm2gDo_sYjNWU6EEsKmOXt5uUu87Lj1oFzqio79MxSx2SYrNg@mail.gmail.com>
<54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org>
<CABm2gDpt60B=Sf_2X9xt4fPH7x4fff7K4h36XfosHigV5tP+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org>
<CABm2gDoS+XOR7Ugt91kNWNdvwsb1_Zb-aO0sma_Xps2Sx-0N5g@mail.gmail.com>
<54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org>
<20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org>
<3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com>
<20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org>
<E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
<20150219033205.GS14804@nl.grid.coop>
<065C5F2E-FC1D-4994-A39A-9125D663FC71@petertodd.org>
<EEF57CF9-5AFC-465B-ABA7-1B53118D6A5E@bitsofproof.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1424323659;
192d39b9;
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [80.237.132.66 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.5 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1YOJeF-0006Hp-29
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re:
[Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:27:40 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_0C38D4F5-48B3-46ED-A969-9C7EB9979745
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
On Feb 19, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> =
wrote:
> I launched a Lighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib =
consensus. Let's turn the debate to a constructive vote.
>=20
> See on https://www.reddit.com/r/LighthouseProjects
I should have added the project description here, as above is only =
readable with lighthouse:
Java Language Binding for Core Consensus Library
Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 comes with a library for external services that =
validates Bitcoin transactions with the code base of the core.
The proposed language binding would unleash innovation of JVM =
application developer without raising concern of a network fork through =
incompatible alternate implementations of the protocol.
The language binding would be written with lightweight, immutable, self =
contained data classes that use only language standard libraries, =
therefore suitable for any service framework.
Tamas Blummer
--Apple-Mail=_0C38D4F5-48B3-46ED-A969-9C7EB9979745
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU5XQ/AAoJEPZykcUXcTkcyLIH/jgOHud0jgwzdShOUwPhzN5O
W2nTUci8zJhm7LFHjqc2nAxZshWn3jUtlRGvd9ezKYeowCSA90Droinjk+VvnEda
trebf+a2LzULKkrDRunJqPlQG3s8YJY1C3VD9jRyLufQYqAxRYwapRLscsBEb7io
USrZjZs4FISiVQJmDdBkmHNoI/YWkeRi2RFkDwzW8VDxlfFGaaTtDKhzz24NYvOj
yBFJA3f/w5Gy1FI3yc+KtP0hlbFdnCwH4o2zAnESR5EY35Q+gjn2MKrBgxA0HCYn
X3kkSXE/zAm0mC6wWDMwOKC55rEleR/MsnsXmJmdvt6t/fUWyWKaAoKlRJm7cPo=
=zjWa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_0C38D4F5-48B3-46ED-A969-9C7EB9979745--
|
