1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27D9D19
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:51:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com
[209.85.213.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D581129
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ig19so1290710igb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:51:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc; bh=BcdMAsLQphvsDm3gM6Eq3oAYljOspWBGxUtMv9IA124=;
b=F/JvfT831rWfIu7Jja9Jrji+gymhInYSjco//tqBQtefgNrpSpeW5tB8Ha7kHcGDSF
V+iONCja6jZGg8DFFVZK4LBlDu4NW5Iw6/nxvflBkgrTEJHg9qAobvYI8GtQc6Xro/IN
9EfTX9A4NaJDeUrN3e+XUC6KULPPBl9QvYdBl2wwH3nk+eZo1j5amVJq1xecrIr9AMri
nQ1/tTih4Cki+zcQknmeHxW+1x+9Z0rix05pnWjsGWKCQrya5vGxelBqTxcnrU9zT0Uk
tRXRsMY2n5qTcmaqH6etJ2gxhDd6AHHPuxFN8zaU/bac0NcttFU4xRlpIVdjKVEzFCpe
yjng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=BcdMAsLQphvsDm3gM6Eq3oAYljOspWBGxUtMv9IA124=;
b=TGKicOaHjr48FswSF1dXckZclk3ubAm4sL2WjHZ/DhZFCwNzu05ph3ltNmHHplZOjH
Dy5vO1JZxkpF1GwhhAXlHzAYWz69Ki4lK3eIvYMkz0wgKuvS/vxFthKLB7SwTcslPGuI
XqAr0WWuL7lUB6tTVcM60dgImZiy/WmRngbokl1nvnP3sgVlhboHL+mYCSYpvlXWpSUC
DVFK2B0Hez2J0Wfy5q/S0kA2Qz4s4JyKxYqitcPvoavloj3iTnd5PgUC/uTg2fdJyYKz
YyfDUQf5SgKrK3/4oYuZabVKRyeUbhfBiKo/gnoIm7dErO5N4sM1Q5HndoC0nZedoz3P
59Qg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJELkg6kXqWDiVV1O4tqq1+fsRKlDkuIPYxwMRUUnx5eK4UpDZU5VYfY2IHBzddgYDdcm2hLVMzFNqcuQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.73.161 with SMTP id m1mr13655053igv.48.1457383860964;
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:51:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.198.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:51:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUwRvuR9qtYc+rVh1yPbQoESxm4m0r6a+Fd6VF=FuT0vom_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHUwRvuR9qtYc+rVh1yPbQoESxm4m0r6a+Fd6VF=FuT0vom_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:51:00 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: SOvm96dK39iXTTq1w59kXHGDLcg
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQi1X4v9WxT1pnd_XSyE2b8hUZUv0z5A8cOEvw5RztOKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
To: "G. Andrew Stone" <g.andrew.stone@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:57:47 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Services bit for xthin blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 20:51:02 -0000
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, G. Andrew Stone via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The Bitcoin Unlimited client needs a services bit to indicate that the node
> is capable of communicating thin blocks. We propose to use bit 4 as AFAIK
> bit 3 is already earmarked for Segregated Witness.
Does this functionality change peer selection? If not, the preferred
signaling mechanism is probably the one in BIP 130.
Otherwise, I think the standard method for getting numbers has been to
write a BIP documenting the usage. I don't know if that is intentional
or just how things have previously happened; and I don't have much of
an opinion on it.
|
