blob: 8978c124f69fe29541f6a8ec121cbc7a70b557b5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <andyparkins@gmail.com>) id 1X32BV-0006Ig-FN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:01:45 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.170; envelope-from=andyparkins@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f170.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1X32BT-0001WQ-HY
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:01:45 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id cc10so12108465wib.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 05:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.19.65 with SMTP id c1mr57401995wie.16.1404475296487;
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 05:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from momentum.localnet ([91.84.15.31])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
nf11sm44668803wic.9.2014.07.04.05.01.34 for <multiple recipients>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 04 Jul 2014 05:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:01:33 +0100
Message-ID: <5408721.UFIVL0MiXs@momentum>
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.4 (Linux/3.10-2-amd64; KDE/4.13.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRrAOgEv7Hq4BofS5UoDPsJy3hEt34od54pY6vtEq0Agw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <10566815.3CllqoMfON@momentum>
<CAAS2fgRrAOgEv7Hq4BofS5UoDPsJy3hEt34od54pY6vtEq0Agw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(andyparkins[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1X32BT-0001WQ-HY
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] ASIC-proof mining
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 12:01:45 -0000
On Friday 04 July 2014 04:37:26 Gregory Maxwell wrote:
[excellent explanation removed for brevity]
> > Apologies in advance if this is a stupid idea.
>=20
> No need to be sorry=E2=80=94 talking about these things is how people=
learn.
> While I don't think this idea is good, and I'm even skeptical about
> fixed versions=E2=80=94 I promise you many other people were thinking=
similar
> or even less useful things and will find the discussion interesting.
Thank you for the very thorough and courteous response. I'm sorry that=
I=20
suggested something that had been thought of before (seems to be the ca=
se on=20
every great idea I have for Bitcoin) and was not practical; but I'm gla=
d to=20
have had your response which was certainly educational for me.
Andy
--=20
Dr Andy Parkins
andyparkins@gmail.com
|
