1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
|
Return-Path: <christophera@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737EC002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6357821EF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E6357821EF
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20210112 header.b=s7TDu/KY
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id aKw8O_c5V3MR
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org A9AF9821BF
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AF9821BF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z27so6151571ljq.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 03 Feb 2023 10:47:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=sPCtNMIaHfU/qaW/8iLU0TnJ/e1XUwI6jvVqUZWBwUE=;
b=s7TDu/KYON4WW8juk+E3kSZJRmswcCeNlgxEkpzRrXKcfcbkODUJHbEIwdukRBR8rE
iyZf5kg9/Uu3vYkWkSrvQ9TrB8Sz+iU65cS1gAO2YPC8jKfMYatAWnCrIJQaj4GGoKOz
Ac93xharNqiXTCTUTsZHvFaqms+CcxEPoLegmEYN/VnTvODqFDY8LXTziObAZLMmrOtE
BLBajNEXox35ePMXyRhdZLkZETGqG9TExb8J/KEAGjZ3lMHCam66Pqc9zkzgOVOCGGhE
4EYp4L8Yi2mExYHZNsrlwuf1MDfrgcn0lbcOVhySTWdOye0Mfqvne8b0h65K9it5kTzk
0CbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=sPCtNMIaHfU/qaW/8iLU0TnJ/e1XUwI6jvVqUZWBwUE=;
b=ov+MNU2eb2hrRtVj7h/3X6TB/ojR0LMmMAIY44wksTNcz1sK9Kl19b1MxKzfy0GONr
zM1bCFdA2yEPk5L0JZhaxoZWxpCTeSmi1e120Fo+iQpr+RDY55XWaLPmtmqZNDRlAnpH
0Uoqz38roNBTCj+a3oeQuFusAXbBHoD1xX5OV2IrZPdVeBdnhpx1EyrjeHN15BmGA7zw
0iVR/vcaw51RWQGABFICz0lxU+cIpt11MaRpt3fTVm5qoJPOQd5uukWEmHAMEDtJ+rAv
+61LBvZAd7/jXJzyRVX/J3n8DGCe4wlB4r6PYOzqDPM5MML1O7szSARdtpHptNkc+Fqm
eAsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWgHYPEZo4wuSU/Nqn42doDh2e37w/J0xGLolSJTxAjA+en4A22
dSP/CKnKfMyTxrfq3aXjsX79g+ru+goEmHFV3H4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/XpOXwDw8PTOsNAWRFFGBOsdXmPANFo+uZo0jCIvk5UaYH+QzzOc/DahVjnLvCjzQQajR5vaI3yNTUYUt86Cs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8495:0:b0:290:6432:f31 with SMTP id
b21-20020a2e8495000000b0029064320f31mr1961503ljh.212.1675450073531; Fri, 03
Feb 2023 10:47:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
<ca8622cb-445e-4258-bbac-b3ee1ce95f4c@protonmail.com>
<57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
In-Reply-To: <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com>
From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:47:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CACrqygCNf3Gv8+VjhyqS4GTb3Epo8qXEKGtQB6sqyR6ib44-fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:16:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:47:57 -0000
--00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I think the right way so people don't invent deviant things is to
> increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can
> hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" if the
> "what" is a hash for example
>
Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and
maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of
scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think
we'll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios.
-- Christopher Allen
--00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vi=
tte via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation=
.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-colo=
r:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I think the right way so people don=
9;t invent deviant things is to<br>
increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can=
<br>
hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" i=
f the<br>
"what" is a hash for example<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>=
Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and=
maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of =
scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think we&=
#39;ll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios.</div><div><br></div><di=
v>-- Christopher Allen</div></div></div>
--00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0--
|
