1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <thomasV1@gmx.de>) id 1RtgDF-0004kJ-2O
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:03:33 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.de
designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender)
client-ip=213.165.64.22; envelope-from=thomasV1@gmx.de;
helo=mailout-de.gmx.net;
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RtgDD-0002ps-VG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:03:32 +0000
Received: (qmail 13182 invoked by uid 0); 4 Feb 2012 14:03:26 -0000
Received: from 152.81.11.206 by www015.gmx.net with HTTP;
Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:03:25 +0100
From: thomasV1@gmx.de
In-Reply-To: <1328034145.2832.11.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Message-ID: <20120204140325.16110@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1328020046.70720.YahooMailNeo@web121002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<1328025899.2832.5.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
<1328034145.2832.11.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Authenticated: #19670841
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+OvwhPMLCO/xeyShtEtkLToJHPWrxbWl09PlDTlx
bfoUFY9vU7jRJ1FfmbTpaMEdpTLGizDmt9TA==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: +l9fby9neSEqblhER3Uh2Bx+IGRvbwBJ
X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(thomasv1[at]gmx.de)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (thomasv1[at]gmx.de)
X-Headers-End: 1RtgDD-0002ps-VG
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 20 Rejected, process for BIP 21N
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:03:33 -0000
Just another question concerning BIP21:
On the wiki, the description of the "message" parameter reads:
"message that shown to the user after scanning the QR code"
I believe that the purpose of this parameter is to contain a description of the transaction. This has use cases that go beyond QR codes.
If I am right, then I would say that naming it "message" is misleading. In fact, "message" suggests that a message will be sent to someone (the recipient of the funds? a third party?), which is not the case here. That parameter should probably be called "description".
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
|
