1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Return-Path: <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473BC0037
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:46:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E8382281
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E6E8382281
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=Yy1ixGpQ
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IK-7IL6W8C53
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C26B820D9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 4C26B820D9
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id
ca18e2360f4ac-7b71b10391aso199322139f.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:46:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702946782; x=1703551582;
darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=GXoI7PxGAfJmtG1+4y18MZBARUHi+rEe6fnldx0qXBk=;
b=Yy1ixGpQnCJrHegq42Idb0A6jIYJiJl/A+8f+BaW5T8pHW7QcVNuydo79cmE9yVei7
ZMWBnTPTRPXh6mg+1g/uxgC79eiH61satgtJTRT5cgvsZHtYiHryBV3HhumKmL1flXGu
WC0yiELD/tZoSxAA8mK+SAiRqh5pFpvrPgjYryVOmIJUNqaV6lzf3IzwR/5Gc5fWV0NW
5UBfqJaKsbqigUbPQxdI0jKFZRUjsEHO9Nb/Y4IZgBZUbARXGI757T56q/3zqqdtHaDF
sFGrToc3uNDKgW9gSSN9n68qkykdUFZjqgapesPQPOs+STN6JNJbnK2sa485WRNxkQQq
GAlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702946782; x=1703551582;
h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=GXoI7PxGAfJmtG1+4y18MZBARUHi+rEe6fnldx0qXBk=;
b=vczKTptDCgpyaFJ95U0IEVDRDs1FmW+6t6Na2uaNP5dy/ZpSxt8h96YKRrE9KAtDAW
3sdTOerjw/Hy1TP3JywHLewFOkr2MRL2GgjtBB1kUEV8PsZcmFfN5EcmyMUoPSiKZ3ZQ
24mHcCaabRA9LwmDNfce1p0ywCA3+f42nzMckaEpsHye5eOgXdgbIN1IIQOHLYQiOWqn
+saU9dkDcF/nP7qHaXwnjVTqf18EC79m0ca+/wcG3KEqFodo/HFG1Gn+O/bvuxSBV1fy
iYgsz2jXcvFewbJF3TO/wmz+2ZGrFFq97gTD4RX2Q4K9KNfQLr7ThvtcaV+dy+yjlCtN
VhOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwxK2c2omnf4I4G0AQjWm+QDhrxdLKtjRlfDXbzO/qi2XIrDBMi
7NZgP+fEzE2FnS79k8iveysxIc4HnMyA9K68k24=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFsupM/PePTUyeMgmOyOS0dSWCa3PFev3oskRryvyK9aj7Y/j1RadnF8YdXgcT6PZSydgYvBfeMFCfp8Z2BUKE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:388e:b0:35f:bc20:b7d9 with SMTP id
cn14-20020a056e02388e00b0035fbc20b7d9mr662602ilb.30.1702946782178; Mon, 18
Dec 2023 16:46:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <nvbG12_Si7DVx9JbnnAvZbNdWk7hDQA23W1TXMkfYoU2iBA95Z1HzRnXgyiwFhDBmdi_rWL0dPllX1M9N9YZPDV47VgYADNd7CQA9CkAuX0=@pm.me>
<CAFC_Vt5xqhuXjNVeSGE2Pn=0N0MuB6pOnREzGhSQSpk+hTUUSg@mail.gmail.com>
<-lH1AcjRwuxfuqLPFOh_oga10Qm12fb7Se9imDeS5ft6CU3y8KTQa3tBP0twJJBFSHgj7FC8EIxvEser3oZdWvkeitRwERQl_cCdgAWtbTU=@pm.me>
<CAFC_Vt7B1oV0_uAwKe3NQLWE2jdQ_MF1W4fnVqkf8s=YHyfVyQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1aHuuO-k0Qo7Bt2-Hu5qPFHXi4RgRASpf9hWshaypHtdN-N9jkubcvmf-aUcFEA6-7L9FNXoilIyydCs41eK4v67GVflEd9WIuEF9t5rE8w=@pm.me>
In-Reply-To: <1aHuuO-k0Qo7Bt2-Hu5qPFHXi4RgRASpf9hWshaypHtdN-N9jkubcvmf-aUcFEA6-7L9FNXoilIyydCs41eK4v67GVflEd9WIuEF9t5rE8w=@pm.me>
From: Nagaev Boris <bnagaev@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 21:45:45 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFC_Vt644Wqn7EcvoZwFscPMov8T5kO9ss_QRgNgVNir-bBA0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: yurisvb@pm.me
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 02:21:17 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Lamport scheme (not signature) to economize on L1
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:46:24 -0000
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 7:44=E2=80=AFPM <yurisvb@pm.me> wrote:
>
> I beg to disagree: key owner broadcasts first bundle (let's call it this =
way) so that it is on any miner's best interest to include said bundle on t=
heir's attempted coinbase because they know if they don't any other competi=
ng miner will in the next block.
What if an attacker broadcasts the first bundle? He spent a lot of
time cracking the hash which is the part of the address in the
proposed scheme. Then he cracked the second layer of hashing to have
both hashes ready. If the utxo has enough sats, the attack is
economically viable.
--=20
Best regards,
Boris Nagaev
|
