1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1YI1KN-0003It-Me
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:41:07 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.48; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wg0-f48.google.com;
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YI1KK-0002tw-B3
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:41:07 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x12so35380330wgg.7
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:40:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.21.161 with SMTP id w1mr17558797wie.44.1422823258335;
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:40:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amethyst.lan (e107003.upc-e.chello.nl. [213.93.107.3])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
di11sm16746638wid.8.2015.02.01.12.40.56
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 21:40:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: xor <xor@freenetproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <2472472.uuMyyaUxq1@1337h4x0r>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1502012133520.21504@nzrgulfg.ivfhpber.pbz>
References: <2472472.uuMyyaUxq1@1337h4x0r>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
2.8 MALFORMED_FREEMAIL Bad headers on message from free email service
0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1YI1KK-0002tw-B3
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9.4 not on bitcoin.org?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 20:41:07 -0000
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015, xor wrote:
> Why is that?
v0.9.4 is not really a release, just a tag in git.
It contains merely a workaround for a change in OpenSSL which caused
problems - see Gregory Maxwell's post.
As the releases are statically built against OpenSSL, it is not
necessary to upgrade if you use releases from bitcoin.org. Hence no change
on the site.
(but it can be used by people building from source, or distributions
packages such as the Ubuntu PPA, which unwisely dynamically link OpenSSL)
> Also, is it correct that there wasn't a release candidate before the release?
> Sounds dangerous to me.
Again, there hasn't been any 0.9.4 release, neither a release candidate or
anything else.
Testing and such should be focused on the 0.10 release candidates.
Wladimir
|
