1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4BD305
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0F86E9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgqq4 with SMTP id q4so122355664wgq.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=0ywjylVpI3yvEUzSbcNren9I+bNMWh23ezy4ZYGQ76k=;
b=XGi0CsEUPGdNLFV4kgfsxFPB68WI4OtP5aiOJr5h5b2qhaYCf+tFBbLExfdkxBYCCF
ixWQiz262EjYMMJv3qTniVmLr6iancNnTZDwQTLkMrbHzIrmmIPCOCfbr4SxBiof2xgX
J73ZhY24esGscp5euNd3IuOrTPg+VpdlV80RuY3gDtP9JklsfKjsUIe+NVmoebNmnOhD
42FNKSAFLu/ZtE0mLTwr4SxZBZSd+r0lioK17kOumxWSq9d4mJV8h1muFWpFS1DwICCg
uWUrz5em0Y1cTKiiIdVb6nRe6jg4/850JePRaJSG0ZxWUvDT5p8JRZPnK1VUIInfRyzw
fOEA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbP3aNdxO/uvYDKrDYLzI6N2W6DPFPUt59GqmyQwn/PNixWAEcMtven+WSb/Hc86W19kMV
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.40 with SMTP id cj8mr13475894wib.92.1435503950105;
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAre=ySbA-JaAZoU1AsGHTZoYOwkeiRnfkYPjMV6yEa_r+SYKA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
<20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
<20150627095501.C59B541A40@smtp.hushmail.com>
<20150627100400.GC25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
<20150627102912.06E2641A3E@smtp.hushmail.com>
<CABm2gDpnzjph5SKTf+8GWgwe+njS=k2GNm9uL73RC-EV=Y5wug@mail.gmail.com>
<20150627121016.2360041A3E@smtp.hushmail.com>
<CABm2gDovynxmZmf_voz-19mmb5k0R4Snxcucx-WObt_stkAL9A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAre=ySbA-JaAZoU1AsGHTZoYOwkeiRnfkYPjMV6yEa_r+SYKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:05:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDo8ZmEO5SHwZVLX0Ajg3vUu2OoJkz2urA61wAoVm_f+zA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 15:05:53 -0000
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrot=
e:
>>
>>
>> No, this is very important. The majority has no right to dictate on
>> the minority.
>
>
> While an interesting philosophical question, I don't think that this is
> accurate. First off, bitcoin doesn't imbue any 'rights' on individuals -=
it
> provides the choice of participating or not, nothing more.
I think you're not contradicting me: ff there's not rights built into
the system, the majority has no "right to dictate" anything.
|
