1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1Wd4xy-0002eT-Ud
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:44:30 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Wd4xx-0002iq-21
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:44:30 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id t10so1208833eei.19
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:cc
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=DuaRggwU9OtApai1wCqLqEnrorIbfAw2lV3xQm0pOY4=;
b=gPMBwqC2gc7c/0A/5WQCy17ttNdeGiLgoMzksDzJM6ibkfczICep/IaolEukgBKzS0
pmJ+FMaR40sKiLmrb81de0TWDifm4usHrcgtMgKb9U9VetAVS95CnhA9i3MNW1/jmvN6
ywAMZo1oBd6rWdph3Ow7vszosndDNwHWvyasyrGR0u7FS0w54gKag0LM28302O7HtRss
OiMRNNU1rPIN7ItRRXUsFmy+nyRCyGJQHydrTiNv338osWKiciQoDda6Yh8UaKODbQn8
7lKfQlWU+6BPdR+vmI0rvb5VjboIhAbqmEdEoflhJfYq3M5fX01oyIJAmC5kA3nL4BBF
Xowg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlW628aYSQg/6fI8DyCrqEKmq70ZGnn1BQLNJTF5cXGo95s7258/tEgX+JPoAdgdVnQyUuB
X-Received: by 10.14.216.2 with SMTP id f2mr19156633eep.83.1398289462470;
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm9802103eef.20.2014.04.23.14.44.20
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53583434.5080601@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 23:44:20 +0200
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBjk4M6+9R=McwWcWda0Pw4u9oGiBR5NDAwpq3dntG6vtg@mail.gmail.com> <53582B52.70205@gk2.sk> <201404232118.58316.luke@dashjr.org> <CAAS2fgTwuBjGJjTC0UyYG5n603m=tf6226FGRo4cyVi93kzKkA@mail.gmail.com> <535831BC.1090707@gk2.sk>
<CAPg+sBg3Ln-xyG6qdXE=Tf8AgnhsZKbygh1z5pk9zuO4AaHDiw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBg3Ln-xyG6qdXE=Tf8AgnhsZKbygh1z5pk9zuO4AaHDiw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
X-Headers-End: 1Wd4xx-0002iq-21
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:44:31 -0000
On 04/23/2014 11:42 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> In that case, maybe it makes sense to define another purpose id
> without accounts as well already.
>
> I believe many simple wallets will find multiple subwallets too
> burdening for the user experience, or not worth the technical
> complexity.
Right. See my previous email where I describe hypothetical creation of
BIP65 and BIP66 which the exact thing you describe.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
|
