1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
Return-Path: <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53F25A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:49:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from st11p02im-asmtp002.me.com (st11p02im-asmtp002.me.com
[17.172.220.114])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264B9149
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.52.6.2] (unknown [101.78.135.131])
by st11p02im-asmtp002.me.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31
2015))
with ESMTPSA id <0NRY011JSVM96B40@st11p02im-asmtp002.me.com> for
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:49:24 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000
definitions=2015-07-24_01:2015-07-22, 2015-07-23,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
adjust=0
reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000
definitions=main-1507240006
Sun-Java-System-SMTP-Warning: Lines longer than SMTP allows found and wrapped.
Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-reply-to: <55FFBC8F-A3C9-4109-89C7-AC359FBBD478@me.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:49:20 +0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <4734381C-2000-4D9B-9099-DDE3D38D64A3@me.com>
References: <CAPg+sBgs-ouEMu=LOVCmOyCGwfM1Ygxooz0shyvAuHDGGZYfJw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBgugLSVEwDLXhgey86_rM2fTjGWXFuXsiZioJKCZiHiNg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbnQQGZoQ92twfUvbzqGwu__xLn+BYOkHPZY_YT1pFrbA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPWm=eW8RgrG1CMEAMN4GeiMjZecFvNtZB_Y4rZNeofWSD0=Wg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcYCUHs9Qe_T6WJOCUSK6stXYD8v6z5JcGHfRMURoOSFTA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDq3JyZx0QCRDbcNSLSOBKdpi4h_7VN1XL8N42U38+eBAA@mail.gmail.com>
<55B113AF.40500@thinlink.com>
<CABsx9T1MTc-GmuQyFN1vaFK=CDWV_L214Pi9nR6jLMouQQD0fw@mail.gmail.com>
<C5A70F53-4779-457A-A06A-686877706F89@gmail.com>
<CADL_X_exckh5T2BfzPEp26fPR3TD69QarwroDEdS_9wtnKbf+g@mail.gmail.com>
<6F436293-9E2B-461C-B105-FC4CF9EBFC69@gmail.com>
<CADL_X_fs3-Zj-9nHu5HXCS=kNFUTJkrUR_8SL+d+M4ziwB66Jw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDqFe+_g5Mk=tXCD94x74pu6SiL+XHhMM-T3bBw78m3Mow@mail.gmail.com>
<D161F6BB-BFB1-4B9F-B024-D60A170F393C@gmail.com>
<CALqmWPC8PdSPS3chhnjBaTixrvvg0VrEaXzd3OvbXifkMs0DUw@mail.gmail.com>
<42BF7FEB-320F-43BE-B3D9-1D76CB8B9975@gmai> <l.com@mac.com>
<D472C05D-7164-4ED1-B571-94415AD8E60F@gmail.com>
<346D4CE0-E00D-4ABB-B131-EFA1416CB20C@me.com>
<29363BE6-72A7-4D06-A974-C52BA12FD8BD@gmail.com>
<55FFBC8F-A3C9-4109-89C7-AC359FBBD478@me.com>
To: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:49:29 -0000
And it's obvious how a size cap would interfere with such a QoS scheme. Mine=
rs wouldn't be able to deliver the below guarantees if they have to start ex=
cluding transactions.
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-d=
ev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> Quality of service as in:
>=20
>> X satoshi / kb =3D included in block currently worked on;
>=20
>> Y satoshi / kb =3D included in next block;
>=20
>> Z satoshi / kb =3D included in block after that, etc.
>=20
> Block count starts when transaction is first seen. Miners can set X, Y, Z.=
=20
>=20
> Market develops when miners start setting different values and adding more=
transactions to blocks as opposed to other miners with higher settings.=20
>=20
> It basically comes down to the miners themselves if they want a healthy fe=
e market. If they stick to their guns, their influence on the fees will be p=
roportional to their hashing power.
>=20
> jp
>=20
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com=
> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> You are not going to get a fair fee market if your only form of enforcem=
ent is the threat of exclusion.
>>>=20
>>> A more fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality of s=
ervice, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference from a b=
lock size cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only highlight what t=
he cap is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.
>>>=20
>>> Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) and t=
here's your fee market.
>>>=20
>>> jp
>>=20
>> Not sure what you mean by QoS here. Either your transaction is included o=
r it isn=A1=AFt. It=A1=AFs not like you can upgrade to a master suite with a=
view or anything.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
