1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
|
Return-Path: <natanael.l@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D76720
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Apr 2017 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f175.google.com (mail-yw0-f175.google.com
[209.85.161.175])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BA5139
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Apr 2017 14:45:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i203so49067371ywc.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=PC/HdwX12OuWLYWn4iuHqkhoUIFG9UI/NUUBBPu1Hjw=;
b=rktLFfdnfN93VoWCtxG3F4JIDH5iMkh1qKbiFnn54v6VesgSkQQF8RmE/2OW6IZmvX
reVOTmTlOzgpImKILDeQJviXsZW1KIaAVLN85Wn07EUnn0TLQWOIGXSZMTqTWKAO9fOh
NBOBFGni8++XxkrfdR4lH+JJ5CrckELNNuKWNqdS47WnljgF1atBLvELTcPqRPyv6SVT
fWAu5pBEsDcBarUm4vQf/XmsuAGbdS4pPpDHUYmUocXT6+3bpuHCOAen1dt10ehYZmTd
MARUkQYVKnu7DCPnKhzM+K/kbbqzaxhVnuwja8C1mGCptuHxvneG1NMst5XIEI9tm4zE
4HiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=PC/HdwX12OuWLYWn4iuHqkhoUIFG9UI/NUUBBPu1Hjw=;
b=RJ9xnDoYoa8j8vPVSzTEiyr/tkOrKCzRy2E5vO1KW6z6I8fhAkAtxTonl3ZQQqoWa7
VS/8dOwKjrkVi0TZ5IGB0UzPj8zfjWZ8V14U8LC7Z8/6JHavtGY+7IpmTYQJTM8jWFhH
8sEWzGqUVCxYqKg9zNxhlsDR6nRXNwr7E8yw7+I+L+/emHYGALVt2DzJx0TRXY12l4v5
0cM74VxJ7U7iNzNZ37RN4XKYe5ti76/drrDrVg7GrPdKckFYFTTqAeMKa8q4jPIZV/3r
oFYd6oe7mWUmwUyYPBB4Cab+aLnpmklSEE4Vrp5Tm8lG57tdYM0hyrdUxU24vwV3DMxo
K19w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3Ff2oxaPlS/XhcXnFLmybiMJK7SngsJA/ptQdL3GvHuKTnn59wmrOxXpB2gxeAzeDmtWhqLXTnCdTZgA==
X-Received: by 10.129.172.23 with SMTP id k23mr6366159ywh.337.1491057942664;
Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.123.135 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 07:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.123.135 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 07:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAt2M19Gt8PmcPUGUHKm2kpMskpN4soF6M-Rb46HazKMV2D9mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABerxhFY8NoA6sSiz1oZ=01Di8n9+QR1xE6NNtxvm=Ov1bGhWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<9eb001f8-7623-3c79-41bb-7ed6e45b43ae@voskuil.org>
<CAD1TkXtQ8d-yBPtGfzA8E0XMv9vR3Qc0xawpwE6yJgzRH-t5ug@mail.gmail.com>
<2a2b6fc0-f800-2646-55b3-1501cb5d5a30@voskuil.org>
<CAAt2M1_sHsCD_AX-vm-oy-4tY+dKoDAJhfVUc4tnoNBFn-a+Dg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAt2M19Gt8PmcPUGUHKm2kpMskpN4soF6M-Rb46HazKMV2D9mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 16:45:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAt2M1-YBu7Cx_p7YMEX=WkXfJWpz-kdcWKhS1CZrBDM=PuaYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1bae00033b07054c1bfb70
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:45:44 -0000
--94eb2c1bae00033b07054c1bfb70
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Den 1 apr. 2017 16:35 skrev "Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richardson wrote:
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no
>> security.
>
> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when typical
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no place
> in this discussion.
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled networks..."
That's what's so great about Bitcoin. The blockchain is the same
everywhere.
So if you can connect to private peers in several jurisdictions, chances
are they won't all be lying to you in the exact same way. Which is what
they would need to do to fool you.
If you run your own and can't protect it, they'll just hack your node and
make it lie to you.
--94eb2c1bae00033b07054c1bfb70
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature" dir=3D"auto"><br>=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">De=
n 1 apr. 2017 16:35 skrev "Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev" <<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linu=
xfoundation.org</a>>:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"quote=
" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><=
div class=3D"quoted-text">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
</div><div class=3D"quoted-text">On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richards=
on wrote:<br>
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no<br>
>> security.<br>
><br>
</div>> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when t=
ypical<br>
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no plac=
e<br>
> in this discussion.<br>
<br>
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally<br>
controlled networks..."</blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br>=
</div><div dir=3D"auto">That's what's so great about Bitcoin. The b=
lockchain is the same everywhere.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto">So if you can connect to private peers in several jurisdict=
ions, chances are they won't all be lying to you in the exact same way.=
Which is what they would need to do to fool you.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">If you run your own and can't protect i=
t, they'll just hack your node and make it lie to you.=C2=A0</div></div=
>
--94eb2c1bae00033b07054c1bfb70--
|
