1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <adam.ficsor73@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820CF1118
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:25:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05E93405
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id r78so17441325wme.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:25:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=P5rAS6bgSCx6RljS8qNPzgWYRpHazDIzH63mcSX0pgA=;
b=ZpgE9h7YdcH1JZKXnUV5y4uVvFmcoasJD8Y7WMQ6Zwqk2cz1h2jJbQG7urzQt+deSN
p32JvwBRU0kdHGvJM7r1TJg5f4TRPfggy/GmfUePQ9+a2B88APHL7KJIhy0riXKEZC9U
wwxVSZB+sR+9MFqSWjOPh+lp8v5eLWRO4/TXSeuys5eu+I+nskIcABhnHk8kgd/nWT9e
Mss/Z+wHMKgWRln8Bw+ZsweuJdWqd1dV1JU9t2ZaDCFT7TI6ZiDG6ep6bpvEbRbUz/l9
YCgeNuh77eajzzu7pM4uSThLw6O/rUxuiRIAgr3j6hvsczA8e0SgZeLWQ91H0k1f17cT
wo1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=P5rAS6bgSCx6RljS8qNPzgWYRpHazDIzH63mcSX0pgA=;
b=cdVnCC7Q3ahkUcpIbct7TQbIu0aap3SFL6v1EdrvajmXko9HqvrLo2GZtOSW+Jw+4I
mkxbUhH3+XqeAYYOohXf3HzxlNAt/7q/2Ct0q08brlmYEoXWmb25AD2D4fhGe6GG2Gbd
KR9FOrOU2ib+NMMVp0Wez6bUlJ764OI5OB5fmP+hbasUBoPR2i8u+Hn7i5BDQkQOsk5j
Jmal5Juadl8XAn33R6PhTrLtMTGRknyESH6yVqZeXnMIYsvcCueYQTcNNp2cab2tmZTv
t5DYkS54oNKiDpQ7mMWIvmLs8GXgxixgizfmgLjXsrm15WI/VPahoEho4vJnzmT6Fw7S
YWeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBdjBLTL4Vm2Ntt0oiVZ4lvrk9fY1byxjohcaYQwfMnEOUhn2M1
G8HBcbtnwc+cIMw4w6KzZqZWjJXPXmifESdIyZ8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2266qQC1EoXGKx0lpo7LWl7cAKlw5mWDQfnSCs09KXRFdHPOS7Ln2o3RPeizD2KxGmEUUtVJAPcNpSASH7nxfpE=
X-Received: by 10.80.136.92 with SMTP id c28mr3001635edc.11.1518542751449;
Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:25:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.165.228 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:25:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Adam Ficsor <adam.ficsor73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:25:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEPKjgfJxFebb2NaoT1Jet9_wzcpTbQvq0jk+d6Qi6DZExJB=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c15e846c80105651b4906"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:26:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Possible change to the MIT license
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:25:53 -0000
--f403045c15e846c80105651b4906
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I agree with the opposition on changing the license, because of the
branding attacks.
However having two coins with the same Proof Of Work is a zero sum game
from a security point of view. It may not be a bad idea to consider
changing the license in a way that only limits cryptocurrencies with the
same Proof Of Work, since they directly affect the stability and security
of Bitcoin.
--f403045c15e846c80105651b4906
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I agree with the opposition on changing the license, becau=
se of the branding attacks.<br><br>However having two coins with the same P=
roof Of Work is a zero sum game from a security point of view. It may not b=
e a bad idea to consider changing the license in a way that only limits cry=
ptocurrencies with the same Proof Of Work, since they directly affect the s=
tability and security of Bitcoin.<br></div>
--f403045c15e846c80105651b4906--
|
