path: root/23/6b42f648f68dfd1684a5c13029a94000fbdb2b

Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D0FC000E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E32740167
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9LzQwlAR9bRY
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E622400E4
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id k20so4609490pgg.7
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 17:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index
 :content-language;
 bh=n36ci6ZuA6pfUwlnCw3kUnFrRq1izPDXbACitPWti1g=;
 b=Jl9lZysC9wCsFmfxdWc9X5GrAM6rs91vybyG17ISaAiaLXMSMJ279Urfxf1gVyD2np
 de9ALMEaIRmeRy2JJa0qYz6mTQz8K4KF4nvcL1ZsHXZ2CEvUCGZIEVt+PMp3HL2FBveS
 iqhqUOlyjvjg66iGCVUqfsUMsu5VIWbJ6O/yk1LNukoodbo9mmOdwtRRJvbwVZUrv4PC
 y1CvU1CKDZZJE9Dk3+DItqGz8EAtTHtXsudHPFy2CHWuHsgoQbr5GovzHVICa71caz2W
 fsb/tus/Xu7bMfhYvU9t3yab91iRhagE5CUfKelk+ZZ2mXeGg6/2Mgrn/hocctpVqcoW
 8zFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date
 :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index
 :content-language;
 bh=n36ci6ZuA6pfUwlnCw3kUnFrRq1izPDXbACitPWti1g=;
 b=tucyi3O/336xKqQakghGktYelhjTijAES/a40Uow+/Z5908/MMYmxNiG2FMXGyb37t
 uqWSUJktXPJ7bz3q0CmG1PrQN7RBzJefpM29/bl3Tuc+z0RAztWqkWHp1lZRCFcwUjPV
 V+bG8q2cm7p0GS2U13utlYTmXlIGYDpSYC1IW1lbn0VfQbKkxUDY1nR+4hLTkS6+mINZ
 oy69C1mKYTHWxdMdfWNoQD+ShmPDzNzFVlyUEdSnjorsp8dTAB+sKzmWxzAMsfZVPJlz
 dpobfzbll9GJguaHoL9zGkpr/bYyck7W7EZ8w9zxUHIJzUwLuEK7rqqgK6E8cYND5j7i
 hNIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dLxE7CJgn4/rwstJFo3GKIF6aY8ROzxPUSQ9MK6X3AwrcD+cl
 RZ5rCugRtSz54MXMLj831SmZAA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwe6OsTk+R5ayUBbvqfyUhF4ZbaxZgusVyPGF/M6GVlHhciwfp/iXxc9TWGxz3DfGMnLuFQfA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:a86:b029:328:566c:d4e5 with SMTP id
 b6-20020a056a000a86b0290328566cd4e5mr9559012pfl.19.1625878192582; 
 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 17:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ERICDESKTOP ([2601:600:9c00:1d0::cccf])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm8584944pgi.74.2021.07.09.17.49.51
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 17:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: <eric@voskuil.org>
To: "'ZmnSCPxj'" <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>,
 "'Bitcoin Protocol Discussion'" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CAGpPWDYgYjUp+PRirca-QrbJZxwtyAnaQmr1kLbuKHSs2K+OBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <00e201d77518$b8ed8e00$2ac8aa00$@voskuil.org>
 <ZoFreCcyjxc8AE2qCEEsUaxR9JmnqCftuu45MV2K9hcusSnF4hIWQzfs1I3A_2efCF0TMTVzGOata5RZfR_hLz0i4wuWO-JTfU9vqbEuxYY=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZoFreCcyjxc8AE2qCEEsUaxR9JmnqCftuu45MV2K9hcusSnF4hIWQzfs1I3A_2efCF0TMTVzGOata5RZfR_hLz0i4wuWO-JTfU9vqbEuxYY=@protonmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 17:49:52 -0700
Message-ID: <00fb01d77525$7e9913c0$7bcb3b40$@voskuil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJUZ/TNyto1vPqYi1vmX7jHk2R5NgIRlp6GAW5tfHeqJWxLUA==
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'Billy Tetrud' <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proof of reserves - recording
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 00:49:55 -0000

> Good morning e,

Good afternoon Z.

> >     Any expectation of interest implies borrowing, in other words, a =
loan to
> the bank.
>=20
> Perhaps this is the key point of contention?

I'm not sure, but from my observations it's long been a point of =
confusion in Bitcoiner understanding of banking.

To put a finer point on it, Rothbard's criteria is a vague in a couple =
ways. Earnings that offset fees are also "interest" in the economic =
context - in which he writes. So even a zero-interest account (or =
negative up to the full cost of maintaining the account) qualifies under =
this criterion. Yet he is careful to say "implies". The arrangement may =
of course be explicit, in which case one no longer relies on implied =
contract, one relies on explicit contract. Finally, one may "expect" no =
interest, and even pay fees, but it may nonetheless be a loan. This is =
what contracts are for.

If one contracts for warehousing service, such Safe Deposit, as opposed =
to a time deposit, such as Certificate of Deposit, Savings Account, or =
Checking Account, then one gets a warehousing service - full fees and a =
contractual obligation to maintain 100% of the deposit. There are also =
money transmission services that move money around for a fee. The =
inability to distinguish money from credit (including money substitutes) =
and warehousing from investment (including "banking") leads directly to =
false conclusions regarding money and banking. Unfortunately a good =
number of self-described "Austrians" perpetuate these errors.

> In cases where Bitcoin is given over to an exchange, there is no =
expectation
> of interest, at least in the sense that there is no expectation that =
the number
> of Bitcoins deposited in the exchange *increase* over time.
> (There may be an expectation of an increase in the number of green-ink
> historical commemoration papers it can buy, but the point is that the =
number
> of Bitcoins held in behalf of the user is not expected to change)
>=20
> The expectation is that exchanges earn money from the difference =
between
> buy-price and sell-price, and the money-warehousing service they =
provide is
> simply provided for free to facilitate their *main* business (i.e. =
brokers for
> *exchange*).
> Thus, the expectation is that the exchange provides a warehouse =
service,
> not a bank service, and this service is provided for free since it =
enables their
> *real* business of earning from bid-ask spreads.

I'm not aware of what are people's expectations, nor would I judge what =
qualifies as someone's "real" business, but a warehouse that facilitates =
trades for a fee is of course a possible business model. PayPal's =
intended (real?) business model was to earn from the float. That didn't =
pan out, because people didn't retain money in their transmitter =
service.=20

Exchanges that deal in monopoly money must move this through traditional =
finance. This incurs all manner of risk. When someone sends them =
monopoly money, there is no crypto-surety possible. This is part of =
their "reserve" just as is the other side of trades.

What matters is what people contract for - agree to, voluntarily.

> On the other hand, not your keys not your coins, so anyone who uses =
such a
> warehouse has whatever happens to the funds coming for them...

One of the essential benefits of Bitcoin being that you can be your own =
warehouse, and be your own money transmitter.

But all production requires investment, which inherently entails letting =
go of your money, producing something with it, and selling it to people =
for other money. All investment is from someone's "reserve". Full =
reserve investment (including banking) is an oxymoron. So whether =
through exchanges or otherwise, there will be production, risk, loss and =
earnings. Otherwise there will be nothing at all to buy, and all money =
will be worthless. This idea of assuring that money is fully reserved =
applies only to that which one does not invest (one's hoard); it does =
not apply to banks, or the capital of any other companies. If it can =
help people feel better about their Safe Deposit (warehousing), I'm all =
for it. But if one wants a 20% bitcoin reserve, one can certainly place =
20% into cold storage.

> And of course exchanges need not earn money *just* from bid-ask =
spreads
> *in practice*, so they are unlikely to provide proof-of-reserves =
either.

If they did not earn money as a bank, the explicit cost of their =
services would be that much higher. Which people prefer is of course =
entirely up to them. I don't know which is more likely.

> Indeed, money warehousing may very well be provided by means other =
than
> proof-of-reserves, such as by using multisig the way Green wallet =
does, with
> better security.

Right, this is an aspect of using your own wallet.

> Perhaps "pure exchanges" would be more amenable to such a scheme
> rather than proof-of-reserves.

Or simply pairing traders, which is of course an existing model.

Best,
e

> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj