1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64889C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com
[209.85.220.46])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7125D112
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacti10 with SMTP id ti10so9815290pac.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=4wxou3BdMb24FdjaVET97vWuW5UJNxd406bPlRh3D8Q=;
b=bTrCSDsqjhSmSxwTsZhEkLF8p7gh9OzVGi2ZBME5fOWBbffVARb9AaYVavxkISf8Pr
d3F5qqQEB+dAx1XHFO2O+Xf6CDPcrcEksdVJ4ZpcyQE+wS30vRyb1PEXWt/J6PzD3bUv
CGJfCz6c4hJePnaJqt8AohVDI/S44ogw/Rk97a8gl06+nOfJ8uyL+7Nl297+hTuNNoy7
VnoIYzpLE5ajhnaS6rEl37bXASnG3hb41ULgWpiNKLbmcgZRHbwzAd5V+Toh+CihCh9+
/Lq6fzT0rAz6dW9KSvCmmIoh+wo+KWmNan02cVYPudKn0FN5hF5if3Z4dbk89xgcd031
RoLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvPdi3hRUk4LTTAe9ONr7yNSfp6H1OikLV4vMjV0CGfqn4BhE3g7tRwhCXtt8dQPPGlENh
X-Received: by 10.68.68.233 with SMTP id z9mr39680263pbt.140.1440375918139;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
nj9sm15122526pdb.77.2015.08.23.17.25.16
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzv8G3EqLBwEYRHJZ+fO_Jwzy0koi2pJ_iNRkXmoVarGcg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <55DA6470.9040301@thinlink.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:25:20 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------010801010703040004020303"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,UC_GIBBERISH_OBFU autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
relative locktime
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:25:18 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010801010703040004020303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
ack no inversion. This can actually allow more direct preservation of
existing semantics.
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html
On 8/19/2015 9:21 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so far only
> Jorge has spoken up. I opted for this detail during implementation in
> order to preserve existing semantics, even if those semantics are not
> commonly used. This was the conservative choice, driven in part
> because I didn't want the proposal to be held up by the other side
> saying "this is confusing because it changes how sequence numbers
> work! it used to count up but now it counts down!"
>
> I can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went with the
> conservative choice of not messing with existing semantics. However if
> there is strong preferences from _multiple_ people on this matter it
> is not too late to change. If anyone feels strongly about this, please
> speak up.
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Timón
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> > Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and also a pull
> request for
> > the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
> > [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564
>
--------------010801010703040004020303
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
ack no inversion. This can actually allow more direct preservation
of existing semantics.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html">http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009350.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/19/2015 9:21 AM, Mark Friedenbach
via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I am indifferent on this issue (the bit inversion), but so
far only Jorge has spoken up. I opted for this detail during
implementation in order to preserve existing semantics, even
if those semantics are not commonly used. This was the
conservative choice, driven in part because I didn't want the
proposal to be held up by the other side saying "this is
confusing because it changes how sequence numbers work! it
used to count up but now it counts down!"<br>
<br>
</div>
I can see both sides and as I said I'm indifferent, so I went
with the conservative choice of not messing with existing
semantics. However if there is strong preferences from
_multiple_ people on this matter it is not too late to change.
If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge
Timón <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
target="_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I repeated
my nit on <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Btc Drak via
bitcoin-dev<br>
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
> Please note there is now a PR for this BIP[1] and
also a pull request for<br>
> the opcode CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY in Bitcoin Core[2].<br>
><br>
> [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179</a><br>
> [2] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6564</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------010801010703040004020303--
|
