1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jtimon@jtimon.cc>) id 1YOUny-0006NH-Ro
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:22:26 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YOUnr-0005Nj-Qq
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:22:27 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi2so1682601wib.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:22:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=Yav8vjfDfGtQ+WsTAX0h+fByS/Ta+kvnlNxL1m5YQyg=;
b=GEdiGTreHnUjnHmkAO5Ei/yoIDP4zKSYlinSFvLQUTE2ZyD+YKg4WEjp/vPQXJwqLN
lMMjhIpouMHLdG78D/w7T7SdyJptVAPfk3D+qdHMpe5c2e46nqflQqkaZwkiwdQUe4mP
iWJXf7scz76HDITUqoiF/FP+KaTppovnKpSRl2hzVtLV7BjkqWKQG0aAwnEmLpCZFdZ4
pqP9dlIFAwODpb2F3uAO+V4zwVaIG4gatcGPSTamWJKkzkfYFGoVuLz2rMWCXjCpQ8Mz
iIJ+BxOkLcJBHMUJxNcZaEYVyYr42BhzSxlXYWGs2g6wSAD3G2un9p/k6NZjwC61j7dA
e0tg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmz9oUW+DcwAOGaBgshTYcga43j3hHHnsxo+DzuXY7WGBgR5CJh3njVFEVeRRJjMbkmLsnq
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.108.13 with SMTP id hg13mr11975264wib.7.1424366210939;
Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.133.74 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [208.90.213.195]
In-Reply-To: <5944A0DB-DFE9-4D30-9049-AD38F37E3756@bitsofproof.com>
References: <CABm2gDo_sYjNWU6EEsKmOXt5uUu87Lj1oFzqio79MxSx2SYrNg@mail.gmail.com>
<54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org>
<CABm2gDpt60B=Sf_2X9xt4fPH7x4fff7K4h36XfosHigV5tP+4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org>
<CABm2gDoS+XOR7Ugt91kNWNdvwsb1_Zb-aO0sma_Xps2Sx-0N5g@mail.gmail.com>
<54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org>
<20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org>
<3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com>
<20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org>
<E0CB8E24-C67D-48B1-8D9F-2B71BAF13446@bitsofproof.com>
<20150219033205.GS14804@nl.grid.coop>
<065C5F2E-FC1D-4994-A39A-9125D663FC71@petertodd.org>
<EEF57CF9-5AFC-465B-ABA7-1B53118D6A5E@bitsofproof.com>
<CABaSBawRXzeoHEvVBJK_JpvrtZq6tzhASRf3JLsz=skbrMq1QA@mail.gmail.com>
<5944A0DB-DFE9-4D30-9049-AD38F37E3756@bitsofproof.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:16:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqk0GbzWV-J1ZqTgeSpruiq=sxTmt6bquJ406WNDaiVrA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YOUnr-0005Nj-Qq
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re:
[Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:22:26 -0000
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Second, I think that squeezing all possible language bindings into a project is also unproductive.
>
> The language binding would be an independent and separately hosted project only using the C interface of the libconsensus library.
He didn't said "a project for all possible language bindings", just
java bindings. Other languages' bindings would be separate projects.
|
