summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/22/9202d23fa7bd3121779d5d1a3a972835185d03
blob: cb312b5b45f4cc98b964c06f41a485c4bf2b58f2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
Return-Path: <andrew.johnson83@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96046919
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun,  2 Oct 2016 17:18:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f46.google.com (mail-vk0-f46.google.com
	[209.85.213.46])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DCF1BE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun,  2 Oct 2016 17:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f46.google.com with SMTP id y190so111703455vkd.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 02 Oct 2016 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=EvKtYgO3P5brpVkP3T300Za8vbZpbuRlmmmCi98/g80=;
	b=SLKk61t6EmEj4y+2AQQ5zIvsYSWngDgzOGI2Ii+PV1qo/z3r0BWENU3CTFUrDY0imq
	ze99TVPcMpW9zXaQptdxZ0J3PVRx53qieo53A9LBIaS0DTEFl2doibuIQhW2ikDm+p9b
	TjjNHz9yHqsLgRq3PKKOA375ycZtZmksUDRWPIt02P4b/dsVcThnjPX4a6vtwJO0iPWC
	PUhA8VPJcrrwOCucYjjhB3J3N9dU5MsSf/gtGnRRzlB43Z4PHFzF5SSH+yfgBWohDS9D
	ebN/ntE6CxjnS2hywHijPRr+qnA+pT7S/Dnf0uklR+4gQsVJo3kgbItGavRI2qvyFEUF
	ec6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=EvKtYgO3P5brpVkP3T300Za8vbZpbuRlmmmCi98/g80=;
	b=NR8nDURJsErkqQPGRA2nRItoiBqXvGnV/fekz/aFN0Vklf8ZKL0rI+iZeSYe6cfRrD
	HvBh0X6QvtQNdgHgmETm3NsAjPB5rL/Bv4MChKwgJN6o7kpNnZJXgya9Juqz2sU16oU7
	o2E8I+FASvLhchQEbu9+Ii48sNwr+7fgYkwNIkupa3MVNALg0frEFRyTQ9UyeK6oLWXz
	uc9mS37k5cIVqa+o++pwWKTflhQElysOo9ttFyk13vI/IR2yOBaWJZ5uZDY/tRPVa2o3
	qHj4ZolnomZ3exsdvd8ZaSB8Tse/ST8yA/uWfu8PDYkEnl4Ayqc/gifYLTq2CuWYlwdh
	fVNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlFblUreNok0IdwIkh4GloIlYvhXj++SVNFSN25FrnOmbq3BomRFkmxYTRl/NsoiBdQm6Mi7RJgWp7HWw==
X-Received: by 10.31.107.152 with SMTP id k24mr2701642vki.136.1475428689175;
	Sun, 02 Oct 2016 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.44.195 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 10:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.44.195 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2016 10:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161002171137.GA18452@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <CAKzdR-rsy1m-H4fYFuCim5+YJi_C2kgjxymM8A7_nEuqsZoO+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20161002161717.GA13915@fedora-21-dvm>
	<CAKzdR-qsj80cuq27YP0hCXtSL734G4QatmopLANpynvQYNRU=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20161002171137.GA18452@fedora-21-dvm>
From: Andrew Johnson <andrew.johnson83@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 12:18:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAy62_+cqR0-DBbKhePo+VqTJc099zXJR0EurLyb1XURUCT36g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11478e46e8e999053de502f2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:32:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Drivechain proposal using OP_COUNT_ACKS
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:18:10 -0000

--001a11478e46e8e999053de502f2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The purpose of this list is highly technical discussion, not political
disagreements.

Is this particular proposal encumbered by a licensing type, patent, or
pending patent which would preclude it from being used in the bitcoin
project?  If not, you're wildly off topic.

On Oct 2, 2016 12:11 PM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 02:00:01PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote:
> > Peter, are you really going to try to down vote a decent free and
> > open-source proposal that benefits all the Bitcoin community including
> > you and your future children because a personal attack to me without any
> > logic or basis?
>
> I've suggested a way that you can rectify this situation so we can
> continue to
> collaborate: Have Rootstock adopt a legally binding patent pledge/license.
> I'd
> suggest you do as Blockstream has done and at minimum adopt the Defensive
> Patent License (DPL); I personally will be doing so in the next week or
> two for
> my own consulting company (I'm discussing exactly how to do so with my
> lawyer
> right now).
>
> If Rootstock is not planning on getting any patents for offensive purposes,
> then there is no issue with doing so - the DPL in particular is designed
> in a
> minimally intrusive way.
>
> Please fix this issue so we can in fact continue to collaborate to improve
> Bitcoin.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a11478e46e8e999053de502f2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">The purpose of this list is highly technical discussion, not=
 political disagreements.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Is this particular proposal encumbered by a licensing type, =
patent, or pending patent which would preclude it from being used in the bi=
tcoin project?=C2=A0 If not, you&#39;re wildly off topic.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Oct 2, 2016 12=
:11 PM, &quot;Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoi=
n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&=
gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sun, =
Oct 02, 2016 at 02:00:01PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote:<br>
&gt; Peter, are you really going to try to down vote a decent free and<br>
&gt; open-source proposal that benefits all the Bitcoin community including=
<br>
&gt; you and your future children because a personal attack to me without a=
ny<br>
&gt; logic or basis?<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve suggested a way that you can rectify this situation so we can cont=
inue to<br>
collaborate: Have Rootstock adopt a legally binding patent pledge/license. =
I&#39;d<br>
suggest you do as Blockstream has done and at minimum adopt the Defensive<b=
r>
Patent License (DPL); I personally will be doing so in the next week or two=
 for<br>
my own consulting company (I&#39;m discussing exactly how to do so with my =
lawyer<br>
right now).<br>
<br>
If Rootstock is not planning on getting any patents for offensive purposes,=
<br>
then there is no issue with doing so - the DPL in particular is designed in=
 a<br>
minimally intrusive way.<br>
<br>
Please fix this issue so we can in fact continue to collaborate to improve<=
br>
Bitcoin.<br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http=
s://petertodd.org</a> &#39;peter&#39;[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org"=
 rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</a><br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>

--001a11478e46e8e999053de502f2--