1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Yz4WE-0005Cd-1L
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 31 May 2015 14:47:18 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.215.51; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-la0-f51.google.com;
Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Yz4WD-00082c-7C
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 31 May 2015 14:47:18 +0000
Received: by labko7 with SMTP id ko7so81765818lab.2
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 31 May 2015 07:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.4.72 with SMTP id i8mr17274108lai.32.1433083630904; Sun,
31 May 2015 07:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 07:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHcfU-WfSPCFrX5OwGQCtOEtDTwWBRmN2r5m_Fi3wAsO7eQWUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me>
<CAFzgq-xByQ1E_33_m3UpXQFUkGc78HKnA=7XXMshANDuTkNsvA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T0kbRe31LMwk499MQUw225f5GGd67GfhXBezHmDqxkioA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzgq-z5WCznGhbOexS0XESNGAVauw45ewEV-1eMij7yDT61=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzgq-zTybEQyGz0nq90u5n5JZcJzxQS_XKaTpr5POJi-tHM6A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHcfU-WfSPCFrX5OwGQCtOEtDTwWBRmN2r5m_Fi3wAsO7eQWUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 10:47:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2A_Q7ebYTiREO8-2z99UHGRX1a+R=+-u8D6H-XfsYQgA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Yifu Guo <yifu@coinapex.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01494248c0e9b1051761c868
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Yz4WD-00082c-7C
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 14:47:18 -0000
--089e01494248c0e9b1051761c868
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Yifu Guo <yifu@coinapex.com> wrote:
> comments, question and grievances welcome.
>
Thanks for chiming in with facts, Yifu!
Do you have any real-world data on latency/bandwidth/cost through the gfw ?
Chung Wang's post was very helpful to get away from hypotheticals to "what
would it actually cost."
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--089e01494248c0e9b1051761c868
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, May 31, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Yifu Guo <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mai=
lto:yifu@coinapex.com" target=3D"_blank">yifu@coinapex.com</a>></span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div style=3D"font=
-size:12.8000001907349px"><div><div>comments, question and=C2=A0grievances =
welcome.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>=C2=A0</div><div>Thanks f=
or chiming in with facts, Yifu!</div><div><br></div><div>Do you have any re=
al-world data on latency/bandwidth/cost through the gfw ? Chung Wang's =
post was very helpful to get away from hypotheticals to "what would it=
actually cost."</div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_=
signature">--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</div></div>
--089e01494248c0e9b1051761c868--
|
