1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Return-Path: <rot13maxi@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F80C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FEC405B0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 43FEC405B0
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=hkO4nvY9
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id FPLt0TKlH6pS
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org D16D14010F
Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch (mail-40131.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.131])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16D14010F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:10 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1669421542; x=1669680742;
bh=0US996hwYQRhQV/3u6AIVxcs4uBh2cW2cQmdaFYUtsg=;
h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
b=hkO4nvY9BpstOECqOAvtz/KBd+o7LG2iOqzK7p6kAPISD/n8OjxlgVI0c/ithjyzB
rm/WVFyK6NxS7PHiDABA/3KmBX6vU20ktFAPj5aLJt3kOMJLkHpVqYMZ5R8gIwsyqn
dJbadmDv56vFoJkzWThGgh4DP+lj7ElbDgGDOzLT9nAnzqzKPNxIQc5s0Ut95XloO0
PFIRPyDYZvYvdMFlum+boTgsEgAuD+mamiYxGyJ2A8mKrlFRg6Yo3a53vsAzYVH6qc
CZNRyfsNoxDkIVwT6zZbiszNtxDUZZ6h82wdMrQ40cwyRQvVoKwu/QiJhQMVEQAamY
jExGdYtn6UyCg==
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Melnychuk Oseen <amo.personal@protonmail.com>
From: Rijndael <rot13maxi@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ded6a45-9e79-511b-f1db-384168102890@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Kcqi_Svol1F4H8rGnnECZXRkb5Aa_763DlNUP4froIqLovFk-SrOnWXC5ZPtfRjzHb55_BTe07h6PH5OdaY2zpNPNTix__bqYiBIEw2IbjA=@protonmail.com>
References: <zKbMpqEqH6Z4p1GE2rlsOky1fMPBsEFGaeNk8WIcbez__-fR3ahnYEWOgExHC8KXAYCqtt4gMa7WBXkNSqL6fO9sjsvyu9AZRPQIQADqthg=@protonmail.com>
<Kcqi_Svol1F4H8rGnnECZXRkb5Aa_763DlNUP4froIqLovFk-SrOnWXC5ZPtfRjzHb55_BTe07h6PH5OdaY2zpNPNTix__bqYiBIEw2IbjA=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 41648937:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:14:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Relative txout amounts with a Merkleized Sum Tree
and explicit miner fee.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 00:12:26 -0000
Hello Andrew,
As ZmnSCPxj mentioned, covenant schemes are probably something that you
should be looking at and thinking about. In addition to CTV, I'd also
recommend you take a look (if you haven't already) at
`TAPLEAF_UPDATE_VERIFY`
(https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-September/019=
419.html).
From your description, it sounds like you may be barking up a similar tree=
.
Rijndael
On 11/21/22 6:52 PM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Good morning Andrew,
>
>>
>> Can output amounts be mapped to a tap branch? For the goal of secure par=
tial spends of a single UTXO? Looking for feedback on this idea. I got it f=
rom Taro.
>
> Not at all.
>
> The issue you are facing here is that only one tap branch will ever consu=
me the entire input amount.
> That is: while Taproot has multiple leaves, only exactly one leaf will ev=
er be published onchain and that gets the whole amount.
>
> What you want is multiple tree leaves where ALL of them will EVENTUALLY b=
e published, just not right now.
>
> In that case, look at the tree structures for `OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY`, w=
hich are exactly what you are looking for, and help make `OP_CTV` a reality=
.
>
> Without `OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY` it is possible to use presigned transact=
ions in a tree structure to do this same construction.
> Presigned transactions are known to be larger than `OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIF=
Y` --- signatures on taproot are 64 bytes of witness, but an `OP_CHECKTEMPL=
ATEVERIFY` in a P2WSH reveals just 32 bytes of witness plus the `OP_CHECKTE=
MPLATEVERIFY` opcode.
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
