1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F368D259
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:23:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ADA1AB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7KLNhgq017136;
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:23:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck ([24.114.23.178]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7KLNbQL075384
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:23:42 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:23:37 -0700
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Joseph Poon <joseph@lightning.network>
Message-ID: <20150820212337.GA9981@muck>
References: <CADJgMztgE_GkbrsP7zCEHNPA3P6T=aSFfhkcN-q=gVhWP0vKXg@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzv8G3EqLBwEYRHJZ+fO_Jwzy0koi2pJ_iNRkXmoVarGcg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDod9z6ksgaCv86qFCyKLTQSL3+oNns+__5H77hVhs05DQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-sbOcaogkic2i4A5eZnBQ79LUibsGy0dyKyvQg53ktY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20150819212710.GA17777@lightning.network>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150819212710.GA17777@lightning.network>
X-Server-Quench: bbdf6db4-4781-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAIUGUATAgsB AmMbWVZeUl57XWA7 aQ5PbARZfEhNQQRt
WFdMSlVNFUssBmd9 eEx/Lhl1cgZOfDB4 YU9kECIJCBJ8IRR5
X0pTHWwbZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWxm aCA1aF4ISEgXK3YX Zz0pPg4CJHAoYQ4e
ETEcC3AtVANZG0N6 NkMqXl4VexEVEG8W BUxJCTNYOVRJQy0g Dh9bWEN2
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.23.178/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
relative locktime
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:23:53 -0000
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:27:10PM -0700, Joseph Poon via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:21:36AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-de=
v wrote:
> > If anyone feels strongly about this, please speak up.
> >=20
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Jorge Tim??n <
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > > I repeated my nit on https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/179
>=20
> I am also indifferent, but also dislike technical debt.
>=20
> It should maybe be noted for those who wish to do/write-code-for mempool
> transaction selection (irrespective of one's opinion on it) that lower
> is better, since transactions with shorter relative locks are
> transactions with "higher priority".
ACK on removing the inversion of nSequence from what would be human
readable.
I don't want to spend the rest of my life mentally having to subtrace
=66rom 0xFFFFFFFF :)
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=0GS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--
|
