summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/1c/73e7789554cf160177b90325a956a7350f37eb
blob: 35f101d83347aaeda90e161f4bd35344136608be (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Return-Path: <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C346C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 06:57:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01F613B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 06:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115)
	id 4F1F62E60545; Thu,  9 Jun 2016 08:57:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro-2.local (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch
	[87.102.140.182]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85F1D2D003BE
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 08:57:32 +0200 (CEST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <20160608234728.GQ32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>
	<CAAS2fgTtu8nqwgrO1u8SRuga6ozcYt7NEDR_tv+cuA3uqgtKvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160609014259.GT32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Message-ID: <57591359.4050607@jonasschnelli.ch>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:57:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
	Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160609014259.GT32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="fS1qbn8bfdss4oS3cRF3HTOIS1RNhSlsi"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 151 MITM
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 06:57:36 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--fS1qbn8bfdss4oS3cRF3HTOIS1RNhSlsi
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="qSRNXs7ik6QbD2j3BUjHUtO9Q5efArpwa"
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <57591359.4050607@jonasschnelli.ch>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 151 MITM
References: <20160608234728.GQ32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>
 <CAAS2fgTtu8nqwgrO1u8SRuga6ozcYt7NEDR_tv+cuA3uqgtKvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160609014259.GT32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>
In-Reply-To: <20160609014259.GT32334@dosf1.alfie.wtf>

--qSRNXs7ik6QbD2j3BUjHUtO9Q5efArpwa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 01:24:09AM +0000, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> Reduction to plaintext isn't an interesting attack vector for an activ=
e
>> attacker: they can simply impersonate the remote side.
>>
>> This is addressed via authentication, where available, which is done b=
y a
>> separate specification that builds on this one.
>=20
> Are there any links to discussions on how authentication may be done?

I'm currently working on the Auth-BIP which is not worth reviewing it
right now (I will post it to the mailing list once it has been reached a
stable level where it can be discusses).

If you can't wait, here is the current work:
https://github.com/jonasschnelli/bips/blob/35d7e382cdd6955ff42726c3d06c44=
e33f61ae52/bip-undef-0.mediawiki


Most recent MITM/auth discussion (there where plenty of discussions on
IRC about this topic):
https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-04-04/?msg=3D63463826&pa=
ge=3D3


</jonas>


--qSRNXs7ik6QbD2j3BUjHUtO9Q5efArpwa--

--fS1qbn8bfdss4oS3cRF3HTOIS1RNhSlsi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=l2Zx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--fS1qbn8bfdss4oS3cRF3HTOIS1RNhSlsi--