1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
|
Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E78C14BE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com
[209.85.213.176])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF221CF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbni9 with SMTP id ni9so49043780igb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vinumeris.com; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=a/woiLuEsa8tiPp+yI0VeytBB8w9Y/MNad3KgdWH6yU=;
b=MLSSer6IBoua+oDTHAeF+SwVTG/j7cu8SujDST2NGP8vYcmgiv2P48mxe2FkQLOMyB
zKuR3AY14CpuiaJYcfDnRN8jOvsKiFy9R/ybeBygNQttU4fz+MQ6tXg7VFCZz2fUJwgw
5ltPmExLbp3w1NAk98nmS9ILg4VWG6eeA47PM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=a/woiLuEsa8tiPp+yI0VeytBB8w9Y/MNad3KgdWH6yU=;
b=WMcNhGoCgdTWcv/+ST2Xk14IhIu35ywU7y7Qt8b2tSu1BWMlOMGzP6cTIbCXdVsDCi
4MozXpPs66sqiCDeAO/hP9rPeGWs9A+/5qQuzPRXez0pTHteCCm2mSYBxM5Ku5/Oq3LK
8to9fJhKgJ+uGrTdTHV3CCFJrYdzBEZZlsoa8vAFpOWZyDgKs2qfuqlAaDAowH98aDSO
5qJeljbPPUKbeOpB6P9uRLXWrG0xHgYy5XrI7hweyTHvD55NOz70dCmpuXLfGxyGWR02
Wvqzi712HDlF1IMVds/XZdzTyFhDfCNf/nDZNrtjlycr7TpnYwJa1QjHcPim8E4VOtLG
je4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmw0pCGfrWDPOaKuH80qPXjN4zP+a+lf8abx5Gq6vKFpbE89HzwPuHCLYgZdKMBqfg7PDTv
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.66.146 with SMTP id f18mr15914831igt.83.1443444873278;
Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.226.144 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C0E61EA6-76BE-45E0-8983-A3BC26CC64CF@gmail.com>
References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+w+GKRCVr-9TVk66utp7xLRgTxNpxYoj3XQE-6y_N8JS6eO6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CALqxMTFEme9gYHTAVVLtFc4JCK4hoBLXEhMCRdEXK9cWso_pUA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKQ8xos6S_BBMqZy6wieFCG=eNxahKXrx3mVKuZcxzjruw@mail.gmail.com>
<4965E9A0-0FF1-4A3F-9165-A21AF976E229@gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKSm2Np92+NA77nNMB5LqSyO0=W8dziiMtGO=Jf+7KidHQ@mail.gmail.com>
<C0E61EA6-76BE-45E0-8983-A3BC26CC64CF@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:54:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKS74iF2FNuHtds=3R9++sx9ZP-0tcq_j5XqZw9-6uHkVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc09f6ecd7990520ce3248
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:54:34 -0000
--047d7bdc09f6ecd7990520ce3248
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> we have NO hard fork mechanism in place that isn't highly prone to
> systemic consensus failure.
>
Just use an opcode that isn't currently defined. Done. What about that
mechanism is prone to failure?
Re: coma. No need for insults. Please read my article and address the
points raised there, which, by the way, do not include any mention of SPV
wallets. Although your belief that SPV wallets are "inherently insecure"
seems needlessly trollish - I certainly would disagree, but it's a
different debate.
--047d7bdc09f6ecd7990520ce3248
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>we have NO hard fork mechanism in place tha=
t isn't highly prone to systemic consensus failure.<br></div></blockquo=
te><div><br></div><div>Just use an opcode that isn't currently defined.=
Done. What about that mechanism is prone to failure?</div><div>=C2=A0</div=
><div>Re: coma. No need for insults. Please read my article and address the=
points raised there, which, by the way, do not include any mention of SPV =
wallets. Although your belief that SPV wallets are "inherently insecur=
e" seems needlessly trollish - I certainly would disagree, but it'=
s a different debate.</div></div></div></div>
--047d7bdc09f6ecd7990520ce3248--
|
