summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/1a/33071ca7b7d0d8c7f3d8ad6b1adbdabdf92787
blob: 589be43984e589e406ea69718e78754ffb521ef3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jeremy@taplink.co>) id 1W3zsV-0003l1-F1
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:13:51 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of taplink.co
	designates 50.117.27.232 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=50.117.27.232; envelope-from=jeremy@taplink.co;
	helo=mail.taplink.co; 
Received: from mail.taplink.co ([50.117.27.232])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1W3zsU-0002Mv-Iy for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:13:51 +0000
Received: from [10.64.218.203] ([166.147.102.214]) by mail.taplink.co ;
	Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:23:58 -0800
References: <CAAS2fgTz0TaGhym_35V3N2-vHVzU9BeuV8q+QJjwh5bg77FEZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0huBWqgvQik9Yc26Tu4CwR0VSXcfC+qfzsZqvoU4VJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140113133746.GI38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANEZrP1KAVhi_-cxCYe0rR9LUSYJ8MyW8=6eSJZ65FeY5ZJNuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140114225321.GT38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANAnSg0tH_bK_19rsRRHOeZgrGYeWMhW89fXPyS4DQGmS4r_7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALimQCXgc0eXeOcqFGUaCpSF7gKEe87KzvLqHZwUysV3WyjjGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgShChAQryfUOBp60jB-zxn2tH986fu1HfT+LsNdBYnoYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0P5r2+kxy7w8G=h=TAhdk1jUoW5UOiv-euo47uQY0u9ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.w9q6jdsayldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
	<20140116212805.GA4421@petertodd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <20140116212805.GA4421@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F5D64E97-662D-49DE-9053-89F52FBCB47E@taplink.co>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B146)
From: Jeremy Spilman <jeremy@taplink.co>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:13:39 -0600
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
oclient: 166.147.102.214#jeremy@taplink.co#465
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1W3zsU-0002Mv-Iy
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:13:51 -0000

I hear you, and I really don't care that much what it's called, as much as, d=
oes it work and how!

> I might even try to enter in a "reusable" address in blockchain.info, whic=
h won't work, and I'll just figure
> "must be some new unsupported thing" and move on with my life.
>=20

Regardless of what it's called, Blockchain.info should tell the user, hey th=
is address doesn't let the whole world see every single payment that's made t=
o it! If you paid something to this address, only you know how to find the p=
ayment - look for the stealth address in your transaction list.=20

So if we call the address that has the pubKeys the "reusable address" and th=
e address that's generated from the shared secret the "stealth address" then=
 is everyone happy? :-)=