1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1Z40EZ-0003HP-6Q
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:13:27 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.218.48; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-oi0-f48.google.com;
Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z40EY-0000Mr-ET
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:13:27 +0000
Received: by oial131 with SMTP id l131so8336361oia.3
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=+H+OgAvT0ipniTAY1b+AbDERegmvn0GFXGx6huqfgs4=;
b=GjGiimicS60fAHfmlqEEiJEtADHkxGAx3LGtv5Zo9DF4u+7t9rbyghwvzFnkcYP2Vd
nvhIBJ96ijOII+Yau+jNs+6sX0mydpNNWsFbT2dUOXZlqJP+iruMDUrNDKXDRbDDQZu8
BXzI4g63KvAOBb8mCKh3q8Xece01FWC+IY2hJOpVljWpkdgJmTAC4xDcxZ3FphxLxWsr
cfs8GDwJT3Gt+OHsr26ZIPmBt77r98I2S9bIjUBgUUbXCS/3hC2KiN6O47o8jvW7sGyO
//EGqMQOYDozkA6fghi0Uzqy6d51s6F6DVsf8E4tPmENmL6f3qoz8Z9ElMhSoGta29WQ
SEGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnIZuSUtoPbMZqjMKMPuj/3HljPTMke0eZk6yxYuQew9Yz6UpjCkKbzGYjNLsjnRYIXfHfd
X-Received: by 10.60.134.132 with SMTP id pk4mr18809445oeb.7.1434258801003;
Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.149 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3BB36FC7-9212-42A1-A756-A66929C15D4F@gmail.com>
References: <20150612181153.GB19199@muck>
<CAJN5wHVj=KfQ3_KYOKee9uq4LNPwQ7x5nGuKDHEMUqGF4LSDLg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzgq-y5xBSXexVi0mJw_w89R2_AHJCgmj=gLN4CK_-YaO4-eg@mail.gmail.com>
<3BB36FC7-9212-42A1-A756-A66929C15D4F@gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:13:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0Oh0wm_1SynFdCu+WkVD-gTGk0ZUNgQV0GVj0-3zL=zzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b47252c59a6520518736677
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z40EY-0000Mr-ET
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:13:27 -0000
--047d7b47252c59a6520518736677
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2) BIP100 has direct economic consequences=E2=80=A6and particularly for m=
iners. It
> lends itself to much greater corruptibility.
>
>
What is the alternative? Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory
Board choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of
decentralization, a proper growth factor?
--=20
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
--047d7b47252c59a6520518736677
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:elombrozo@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">elomb=
rozo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">2) BIP100 has direct econ=
omic consequences=E2=80=A6and particularly for miners. It lends itself to m=
uch greater corruptibility.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What is=
the alternative?=C2=A0 Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory Board =
choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of decentralization, a =
proper growth factor?</div></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_signature">Jeff Garzik<br>Bitcoin core developer and open=
source evangelist<br>BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://b=
itpay.com/" target=3D"_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a></div>
</div></div>
--047d7b47252c59a6520518736677--
|
