1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1Vb6KK-0001Az-2E
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:15:08 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.80 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.80; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149080.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.80])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1Vb6KG-0005y5-NC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:15:08 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt10.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r9TAEvno033334;
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:14:57 GMT
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r9TAEqSk066023
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:14:55 GMT
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:14:52 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20131029101452.GA15808@savin>
References: <274a1888-276c-4aa6-a818-68f548fbe0fa@me.com>
<9DCDB8F6-E3B2-426B-A41E-087E66B3821A@gmail.com>
<526B45DB.2030200@jerviss.org>
<CABsx9T2OMA_u=S9yUh2j78QDuCDUorYctktuixjwAjqc6neW=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<526DD18A.7060201@jerviss.org> <l4lajm$3ga$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CAAS2fgSuL4f9Sdg2CyK-EuCKK04gD98zHDoKFyTg_Fp_cNiz=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3p6KFc8FiOgBwLtQsmkETE_iUbMhO47pS7J3hi3a9_4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP1teOnb=Gt_Nybh0jfQopK06Ps34Hy73OxOpHwuz-iZig@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1teOnb=Gt_Nybh0jfQopK06Ps34Hy73OxOpHwuz-iZig@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: f564352a-4082-11e3-b802-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
bgdMdAsUF1YAAgsB AmUbWlReUVl7XGY7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsqCHhw c199CRl0cQVEezBx Z09gWz4NWUJ+dkN/
E1NQFWUEeGZhPWMC AkhYdR5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhES
HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4lEzMw TRkJHn01EFQYSj4v
IhB0YhQGEUQcOVl4 eUN7QRodPgQJAwJT dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: petertodd.org]
X-Headers-End: 1Vb6KG-0005y5-NC
Cc: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>,
Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:15:08 -0000
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> For block 0x11 again shall there be a separate code for "block is from the
> future"? We don't want to lose the nVersion field to people just using it
> for nonsense, so does it make sense to reject blocks that claim to be v2 =
or
> v3?
That would prevent us from using nVersion as a soft-forking mechanism.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000908fddb47210344de50e6d3bd842e649c68853eeee0390dcd
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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==
=eVVn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--
|
