1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8FCAB9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com (mail-pf0-f173.google.com
[209.85.192.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB01237
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:52:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 189so51997637pfu.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:52:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=thinlink-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=CKYeJeDNersiplA/K6FAhjBH/m4mMZ9Jj1XNUWhxfXk=;
b=0exnBByZkLs/lRKey45WU+2A9CoaBwYJPDdgvkOdJY/e3PREKVVRY4Yewp2MqmY+/E
DxDlbrHxavMei6BPQ0Wmx/oapkbrSb9I6UoI0gSiDOE6nfr7Rpi/SZqduS6AXBrMhqEY
8iKQRpqNAY0vQJafgqkIbIUQU2Tjxqxj446JfKaWz4RW47K/u8KOpw+EyLd6UILhOjhb
my32xicGEZOpSV+95OZHRvtd8l1t9d6447qlLfot0vnmyrHIbiujdG662a+u8RHMBWfm
hIz8UWO/Coysr6wS8iAuZ4NRJmL82PqxEqE/8I3JGMKAXVuAMyof96PhVYQjqHXhxiDX
aa5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=CKYeJeDNersiplA/K6FAhjBH/m4mMZ9Jj1XNUWhxfXk=;
b=tSnnoMLnDcpcJtup/8+jqyaRESWECalzntKb/RwvKtt78oUvaNLV5fto6AL5afgiUm
S4rGgY7x0BHtizFRIJsxUR1Ky8Emw3KE7WBS33LbLPIx/1zmaIvaGLzu9uyBEiDlLNKm
V+5gtcEhFY9GDpY1GYg98l2He4TqSW724NKBWMVgnR2EZrb2LTZ6SDMLHtS2z2zbe3FN
55zsthpCsceyb8Hz6+z+4rUdWt7UfwaXSQ8aDgczIT10Uj2EQ1sGG03VPBHVdwh3jKes
41yZos+HU/fr4vuYNpg7cQ9wX10LXZlI+LuisnpQyn2PwusAE+byTjLwv0QBadzKmc+d
w5Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLkB1CC5QugJh21GgoVAth+Y+WmgzGV/Lxiy5GAzWkg+v2tzSzg5ynUpTSnRtFIml/k
X-Received: by 10.99.167.10 with SMTP id d10mr41294258pgf.19.1485283962254;
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:52:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
a25sm7472484pgd.26.2017.01.24.10.52.40
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:52:40 -0800 (PST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Johnson Lau <jl2012@xbt.hk>
References: <A182F080-F154-4F05-B2F1-21B90E469267@xbt.hk>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <efad941b-ce3e-1c98-ca5b-51da66badc6c@thinlink.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:52:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A182F080-F154-4F05-B2F1-21B90E469267@xbt.hk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:06:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Anti-transaction replay in a hardfork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 18:52:48 -0000
On 1/24/2017 6:33 AM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 9. If the network characteristic byte is non-zero, and the existing
> network characteristic bit is set, the masked version is used to
> determine whether a transaction should be mined or relayed (policy change)
Johnson,
Your proposal supports 8 opt-out bits compatible with may earlier
description:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-July/012917.html.
If the existing network really wants to play along, it should execute a
soft fork as soon as possible to support its own hard-fork opt-out bit
("network characteristic bit"). It is totally inadequate for a new
network to rely on non-standardness in the existing network to prevent
replay there. Instead, in the absence of a supported opt-out bit in the
existing network, a responsible new network would allow something that
is invalid in the existing network, for transactions where replay to the
existing network is undesirable.
It is an overreach for your BIP to suggest specific changes to be
included in the new network, such as the specific O(n^2) fix you
suggest. This is a matter for the new network itself.
|
