summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/17/eea8133896f7962f9a81e51525ba4464375daa
blob: 6a29035544d5d34c344ca4394a9ff186e40a0be0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
Return-Path: <larryruane@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D41DC002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2952960F27
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 2952960F27
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=qgfhiV3J
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 59veP0T1B-3f
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 66BBC60ECB
Received: from mail-oa1-x34.google.com (mail-oa1-x34.google.com
 [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::34])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BBC60ECB
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa1-x34.google.com with SMTP id
 586e51a60fabf-fe023ab520so7664738fac.10
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 11 Jul 2022 11:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=vOCOx0lmwxtHP2md3W9Mo+FYa1uCLefDvN3TDyjNQI4=;
 b=qgfhiV3JgTAZYyuz7WS1OJM3hP2bcTWYF7kyyCieYEJuNzubIeM3wKVaefxJpm6QAz
 f0eQrrLCYZAHKlRl3iqQcWne3R37e2P9Dm9ita/9cXuuyvXr2y4omNRjqD866GEWfTiW
 us1TS67rzTjy/G2WBrNRQNfZDmVGGyADC6jde7EQYcbsBmriV8A7KZ8r+R9bTnWmC6TO
 TOwWaoG4VvjS+P1noVuodM849gp/4ZIZdaRAJ1jsvnyIaiLxYwRdqyR/as+jRTfxC7Aq
 Z3g0OYeW+Qs6DIjur2WakJWVvw/0vZgteuz6xumlyw6jd3ZXcVQk701AP6J5LqFBptBU
 sJQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=vOCOx0lmwxtHP2md3W9Mo+FYa1uCLefDvN3TDyjNQI4=;
 b=eAFEXxZPk47r0yybuspCAMI77+TrtYACTSMA3HoFQSWAq6eXWtKfmNdGAdbcK+yZQh
 B462hlRD/N57bLnEWeeb7/InXaIYhp85li9tWTfsahum9cwmMGEjvyLNDBp1Q2j+YwxU
 iJTB3nck897dgH2p7Gasj8NnsAh1USGQaNLNlC52xzo496mDo/tXPvfDO2hozGSXLdI7
 rOOuk1KvXD1IAP5kgjsyXEqOQ+JLLYefSzCSumkqVHTEloGD8R+pQvY4aDT9MiGkx1XZ
 Rj6tAR8HJuOQ/qjXSAF8meGdVO6zmB452Opxs7KIq9cDw+UcYjwDbo+BE8ZGgp+zThqQ
 +xzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8LJuq/0gaQIMLieaoCgq/SuOFlQMpLFeAPISQorSKso5bl0ZSP
 2UZDZz8pmlsRvfEQRjHqLZhQix5BWzK9nB9RC+w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v+8jOD3hxxAj2yxBpYuO4PA4FMqaA0ZWZwJ/bEALK5uXq3pbnx18ZVaOQuyJqL0esIMylngFRA1pD9x490g3A=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:d0c2:b0:10b:fcf8:1273 with SMTP id
 k2-20020a056870d0c200b0010bfcf81273mr8247633oaa.211.1657563978362; Mon, 11
 Jul 2022 11:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Ysl4t9K8lfxRSsNM@petertodd.org>
 <165002130-e93e1ef73ec867025cbf3ea9b2d142bc@pmq2v.m5r2.onet>
In-Reply-To: <165002130-e93e1ef73ec867025cbf3ea9b2d142bc@pmq2v.m5r2.onet>
From: Larry Ruane <larryruane@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:25:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAEpYn+egaW2YMjJfOSTcaquGNpLhYAqf4sBY83WUsynRwQE1cQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: vjudeu@gazeta.pl, 
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:06:01 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:26:20 -0000

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 3:05 AM vjudeu via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Not really, because people that run full nodes, just accepted Segwit
> and Taproot. They had no choice. And in case of zero satoshis, it could
> be the same: you would see zero if you look at raw bytes, but you will
> see non-zero values, if you use some upgraded client, that will support
> amount hiding, or other features.
>
> Segwit: old nodes see no new signatures, new nodes see all signatures
> Zero satoshis: old nodes see new zero amounts, new nodes see all amounts
>
> It is that simple.

I see what you mean, have the P2P messages depend on whether the peer
is running old code (doesn't know about tail emission) or new code
(does know about it).

I don't think this can work in this case. It worked for Segwit because
the P2P differences involved only signatures (which determine whether
the transaction is valid), not the *effect* of the transaction, that is,
how it changes the UTXO set. Consensus requires all nodes to always
agree on the UTXO set.

Larry Ruane