summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/17/16277af5013819d79b6acc09d4b0566312d524
blob: 52ee0cfbb61467a8cbdec651f05b98694f084667 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Return-Path: <slurms@gmx.us>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4C040A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA17819C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:20:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [84.53.244.114] by 3capp-mailcom-bs03.server.lan (via HTTP);
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:19:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-eb8ed324-143d-48a4-9b11-ac782d96c65b-1437823183453@3capp-mailcom-bs03>
From: "Slurms MacKenzie" <slurms@gmx.us>
To: dscotese@litmocracy.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:19:43 +0200
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CAGLBAhdggPPnxLgp+xQPWGtK1KA_QZt7eug2votak4in2DrwJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGLBAhdggPPnxLgp+xQPWGtK1KA_QZt7eug2votak4in2DrwJA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:r3hZNo8u6ItR+AuKo3rPMUcqik1S/iyNPhYQaM+lT1l
	QPLaUYJjdXsFKmjzCVzI4Y6RN9D5u1TLKn/sAH1vD1G2yRr5iJ
	cqHLdbjk3s3SLj0SJ7oPuWSNTBkIw7OCDtRRj4YSEkIdclo3Op
	0qb3STQXUcVyKv4CJYf4jxe/sRF7gHIZaGLKVjKmQBfF/VQDhe
	TKctYvPcdVsGMqIuyukq5wi+GL+yu8+Ye9qADc38PY1ipOAXSL
	9dmNmNVXiDqFiYpTYOpoWoh1avFwvNcWi0oURzO8QJWnqTaI+1
	Iz7J0HdlTtlPLLc1Ae/PETBkyo9
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:3ly56RiE5oU=:H0hvpBeEZb85yqaAilk6OC
	C43Hs/0wE4qA1w9FmsZbObSqsT9o1RmhHSSmVxxIxSO7UUiC+z47Q2/+s/3mi8850kRxdujoI
	nG9VBusN4y6RGJLKcqaqMQDu7zbjDOZm7KD78bf34CX0y9pT4KV0/r1YsUC3kso9AN6O/RKvh
	nKARiIO1z4F+ZFB7A3Cr42+WNUtti89sPZAOmdlawhzoJ4JIuRBJ69g8ZryyOYFO89TYF/Uqi
	l3FR8ygpbitltpCE9DTJ22iFCHEz+eiIUtEAZyw3Yj+Yx0rf1Wjywd2fCGZHFooCrKBAiWQZd
	AMiiCo/Ir72YjlvO1qloA8MhIPdB5Pi4tb7Qs6BmavwwHai+O5twfK3MXCWO48nyo7y098L/9
	70xuDb9Sh5zMQuwN/gVpkit89teiDFV5oY+iXqNczd4r/Pcuj+uTRgIyvHCkWxvhbmm8TZjBo
	nLWXPf5a6A==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015,
 or "If We Do Nothing" Analysis
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:20:04 -0000

The answer to that is a less illegal than probing other peoples web servers=
=2E Up until recently the reverse name lookup for that IP address was marke=
ts=2Eblockchain=2Einfo, which I resolve when I log incoming connections in =
an attempt to filter out some abusive clients coming from university connec=
tions=2E=20

Other people have noticed these abusive clients too=2E There=E2=80=99s men=
tions of other connections running the same version of BitcoinJ coming from=
 sources that appear to be blockchain=2Einfo which display similar behavior=
=2E A user in #bitcoin-dev was complaining about this client hammering clos=
ed ports with connections when they are kicked off=2E=20

http://bitcoinstats=2Ecom/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2015/02/09#l1423513396=2E0
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
> Sent:=C2=A0Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 4:23 AM
> From:=C2=A0"Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoun=
dation=2Eorg>
> To:=C2=A0bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg
> Subject:=C2=A0Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015, or "If We Do Nothi=
ng" Analysis

> When I looked up that IP address, the Whois info names "OVH" and "Octave=
 Klaba" (who founded OVH, according  to Wikipedia) as the owner=2E=C2=A0 "b=
lockchain=2Einfo[http://blockchain=2Einfo]" appears in the HTML header as r=
etrieved by the "Anti-Hacker Alliance" (http://anti-hacker-alliance=2Ecom/i=
ndex=2Ephp?details=3D37=2E187=2E136=2E15[http://anti-hacker-alliance=2Ecom/=
index=2Ephp?details=3D37=2E187=2E136=2E15])=2E=C2=A0 Blockchain=2Einfo itse=
lf returns IP addresses managed by CloudFlare whenever I try it=2E

=C2=A0