summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/17/11ea38a9c72dc191be56e7ec8dadbbc9b60bfc
blob: 4e87b91b75d654fb1de739d8ca7c32572dac4133 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1YLpTK-0004lM-Ke
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:50:06 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.148.100 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.148.100; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail148100.authsmtp.co.uk; 
Received: from outmail148100.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.100])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1YLpTJ-0001V7-EQ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:50:06 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t1C8nwZ2030130;
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:49:58 GMT
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
	[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t1C8nsuX028644
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:49:57 GMT
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:49:54 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Message-ID: <20150212084954.GB22743@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20150212064719.GA6563@savin.petertodd.org>
	<7C171F0B-1EF8-4542-8E18-187B2E94DF14@bitsofproof.com>
	<20150212074509.GC4254@savin.petertodd.org>
	<8BFAFE6A-F85B-4B89-98A0-CBBCAA67B30B@bitsofproof.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8BFAFE6A-F85B-4B89-98A0-CBBCAA67B30B@bitsofproof.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 1f30be3e-b294-11e4-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdwAUHlAWAgsB AmMbW1xeVFR7XGQ7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
	VklWR1pVCwQmRR1y DkBdF3FydQ1AfHo+ bE9mVj5aCkd6JxN+
	F1MGF2QCeGZhPWQC AkNRcR5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhES
	HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4REyY4 ThsPWD8+WEMISm0t
	d1p/chhEBk1NWgAA 
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1YLpTJ-0001V7-EQ
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:50:06 -0000


--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 09:27:22AM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> > IOW, assume every transaction your "border router" gives you is now the
> > one and only true transaction, and everything conflicting with it must
> > go.
>=20
>=20
> You are right that the assumption about the one and only transaction have=
 to be relaxed. Broadcasting=20
> double spend only if it is actually replacing an earlier - for whatever r=
eason, would simplify internal consensus logic .

Wait, what the heck do you mean by "only if it is actually replacing an
earlier"?

How does my replace-by-fee patch *not* do that?

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000012613986506ef6592952234a6a04946ef946ff0836405ad4

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=He0A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--