summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/16/f029a0d9002d905798a611efa6b102e36827b8
blob: efcee8f171580d2130e8f1c55498360c97c51d80 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1V3g6c-0008Pa-4S
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:34:50 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1V3g6a-0001eI-A2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:34:50 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:222:4dff:fe50:4c49])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D67B27A2965
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:17:57 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:17:53 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.10-gentoo; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAPaL=UV9ytoDc-0U148QSbtq=QHFAY1N=nV_1h_dRW12F6YVhA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPaL=UV9ytoDc-0U148QSbtq=QHFAY1N=nV_1h_dRW12F6YVhA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201307290517.54624.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1V3g6a-0001eI-A2
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Opcode whitelist for P2SH?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 05:34:50 -0000

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 7:39:08 PM John Dillon wrote:
> What are your thoughts on creating a whitelist for specific opcodes that
> would apply to scripts serialized using P2SH, retaining the existing
> standard whitelist for scriptPubKeys? (I would still recommend dropping
> pay-to-pubkey and pay-to-multisig due to their potential for dumping data
> in the UTXO set)

This would be reasonable for miners, but for interoperability between wallets, 
some specific standard forms would still be necessary without a much smarter 
solver (which would then expand the code required to implement a wallet, which 
is unfortunate if not entirely necessary).