1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD4598A5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com
[209.85.215.51])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0499107
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l89so21618854lfi.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=JtdDxqbzbaMc0diseQO89Xn00+9bPCnubxwacrT4/Ec=;
b=GX9KlSeaa0iwr3JedEoLqxn9FCeCSV/pbPMPCcgvK15EFVzeWfPTRq52Yvs9CKHDWW
o+bjWpIiIoO0RN4qeD2ZsQxlX+YNtF5UZO6wlEA9k5ELgZJLcbdN5xw8i+bmIvLtjRAE
eKATalbH19Liy2P5CPh2gkbTZHOJGFHG/v+wcHxljA2YUiSXwyz0T89JVAZI0QAv9CoT
WIXB/PJeRfzCLjn0j0UZ6u2DZqSuJaZLzcELS0vyrEltWxHb6Vhv2vut4FvM4Duo3jbG
+l3Ju6S4iZCKVUPvJccXF3kOcskxwMNNP1EnSABZQwveGZmmsjqtf0STWBvjg4/baTx2
rbwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=JtdDxqbzbaMc0diseQO89Xn00+9bPCnubxwacrT4/Ec=;
b=VP9bPGcjdh/DUw7hL0+zzIUO4quyzMzyGa7BgBx3ygX/YV8KquDCjezIdurk2SjM8U
jAYdUR5HQfmg5Hggd0MYEBI/HtYYc77F6fQDCvorNPcw9h28+djdKMSLNLgkjF0+kxLz
tzMAS1mH2HFIu8eflzLSX2m4xA4Fa74/DrEAmTHt6dGRWlzn0t3Ow6ptI0zWmLtXYhHG
IHhj+r0wfQVvUe7Ja2deFPf4xFc5ckCxBuPH95L0lmA6wG1qxoiDa+1Sk5yurF4HXYHu
8Gesl20VvbaK2U1oM23uZoy+9PAgvJiUgg/Bgif+2zfmiizzgrABczoi4MaDq5sX2aOH
o9pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutWMyOysOaJqr9kxLd5cX/K1Oh8vizLOXRvH+WIwxyYK572erzWviPOKR5W2YnmVNMhBwXFusYv/fymGQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.89.2 with SMTP id n2mr1110109lfb.208.1471561580034; Thu,
18 Aug 2016 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.24.153 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201607151531.00058.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <201607151531.00058.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:05:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzucAsUkfs=K8aL8qeCoSNzMJxPsx7dd6dmAcsMy-Hj=5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HK_RANDOM_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:07:15 +0000
Cc: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>,
Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io>, github@dcousens.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Status updates for BIP 9, 68, 112, and 113
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:06:25 -0000
--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Fine by me to update BIP68 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have
activated.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9 should
> progress to
> Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear
> on
> whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals
> requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process
> BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413
> (Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing
> this
> topic to the mailing list)
>
> Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:
> - BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9
> -- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class
> - BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully
> -- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted
> status,
> but also Final status
> -- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status
>
> If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs
> 9,
> 68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I
> also
> need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to
> (and
> beyond) Accepted.
>
> BIP 9: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
> Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
> Greg Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> BIP 68: Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
> BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
> Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
> kinoshitajona <kinoshitajona@gmail.com>
>
> BIP 112: BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
> Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
> Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
>
> BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io>
> Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
>
--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">Fine by me to update BIP6=
8 and BIP112 to Final status. The forks have activated.</span><br><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:=
30 PM, Luke Dashjr <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org"=
target=3D"_blank">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pa=
dding-left:1ex">Daniel Cousens opened the issue a few weeks ago, that BIP 9=
should progress to<br>
Accepted stage. However, as an informational BIP, it is not entirely clear =
on<br>
whether it falls in the Draft/Accepted/Final classification of proposals<br=
>
requiring implementation, or the Draft/Active classification like process<b=
r>
BIPs. Background of this discussion is at:<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/413" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bip<wbr>s/pull/413<=
/a><br>
(Discussion on the GitHub BIPs repo is *NOT* recommended, hence bringing th=
is<br>
topic to the mailing list)<br>
<br>
Reviewing the criteria for status changes, my opinion is that:<br>
- BIPs 68, 112, 113, and 141 are themselves implementations of BIP 9<br>
-- therefore, BIP 9 falls under the Draft/Accepted/Final class<br>
- BIPs 68, 112, and 113 have been deployed to the network successfully<br>
-- therefore, BIP 9 has satisfied the conditions of not only Accepted statu=
s,<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0but also Final status<br>
-- therefore, BIPs 68, 112, and 113 also ought to be Final status<br>
<br>
If there are no objections, I plan to update the status to Final for BIPs 9=
,<br>
68, 112, and 113 in one month. Since all four BIPs are currently Draft, I a=
lso<br>
need at least one author from each BIP to sign-off on promoting them to (an=
d<br>
beyond) Accepted.<br>
<br>
BIP=C2=A0 =C2=A09: Pieter Wuille <<a href=3D"mailto:pieter.wuille@gmail.=
com" target=3D"_blank">pieter.wuille@gmail.com</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Peter Todd <<a href=3D"mailto:pete@pet=
ertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Greg Maxwell <<a href=3D"mailto:greg@x=
iph.org" target=3D"_blank">greg@xiph.org</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Rusty Russell <<a href=3D"mailto:rusty=
@rustcorp.com.au" target=3D"_blank">rusty@rustcorp.com.au</a>><br>
<br>
BIP=C2=A0 68: Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:mark@friedenbach.org" =
target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0BtcDrak <<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gma=
il.com" target=3D"_blank">btcdrak@gmail.com</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Nicolas Dorier <<a href=3D"mailto:nico=
las.dorier@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">nicolas.dorier@gmail.com</a>><br=
>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0kinoshitajona <<a href=3D"mailto:kinos=
hitajona@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">kinoshitajona@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>
BIP 112: BtcDrak <<a href=3D"mailto:btcdrak@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank"=
>btcdrak@gmail.com</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:ma=
rk@friedenbach.org" target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Eric Lombrozo <<a href=3D"mailto:elomb=
rozo@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">elombrozo@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>
BIP 113: Thomas Kerin <<a href=3D"mailto:me@thomaskerin.io" target=3D"_b=
lank">me@thomaskerin.io</a>><br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Mark Friedenbach <<a href=3D"mailto:ma=
rk@friedenbach.org" target=3D"_blank">mark@friedenbach.org</a>><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
--001a114128363e42d6053a60a1aa--
|
