summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/14/ed8317f13605e92d9a21c2ff65788361012ff5
blob: e6122408963e75ff3e6a476a5aee951e52338d84 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
Return-Path: <crypto@timruffing.de>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614DFC0032
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBED60FDC
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:32:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 2EBED60FDC
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=timruffing.de header.i=@timruffing.de
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=MBO0001 header.b=m8if040h
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 2nhanFst24eL
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E28C160FA9
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org E28C160FA9
Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SDghx0y92z9ssT;
 Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:32:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timruffing.de;
 s=MBO0001; t=1698078769;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=mhQeuaXE2eOgDN2OdZFqSRWlVYsR9u6lI+e6Dj1L6fw=;
 b=m8if040hPAUtFbL0WDKpavTXoJ0b878mOGL7KbgEki0SB3CHMGTNj8GdJeJA4YKmeuAutk
 aGpRJaKv00goUxR9crdnEjEdc9T44jzjiLrIUcW9Ycny69eg+sAyuF+ijobG3wPQqRMy4w
 KOiK8yAe/Ho8CNgHUHYVECXPrmBhhoZwSionJxSkojyWMB8UuemG9SdeG5Vv5og4qgY6Bc
 vvj+EqDd/WnugJOw3/7goIkDI+1AUC1PONOzkkpHhcqei35E+GjwwakOCcEUv5VZsCQx1Y
 w6sZ2gkB7up/D1kQROK+G9aPWix/Op3qQ21U7hqGXNe1FYyrsIgMOGObzxHgBA==
Message-ID: <5f1ba40e6b853851112652b0da8eb7d35369af82.camel@timruffing.de>
From: Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
 <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:32:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <ZTaSwtvctmIiF74k@petertodd.org>
References: <CANLPe+OQBsPiTrLEfz=SMxU8TkM_1XNfJQeq8gt2V6vDu=+Zxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZTaSwtvctmIiF74k@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:49:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinals BIP PR
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:32:56 -0000

On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 15:35 +0000, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Thus
> we should limit BIP assignment to the minimum possible: _extremely_
> widespread
> standards used by the _entire_ Bitcoin community, for the core
> mission of
> Bitcoin.

BIPs are Bitcoin Improvement *Proposals*. What you suggest would imply
that someone needs to evaluate them even before they become proposals.
And this raises plenty of notoriously hard to answers questions:
 * Who is in charge?
 * How to predict if a proposal will be a widespread standard?
 * What is the core mission of Bitcoin?
 * How to measure if something is for the core mission?
 * Who and what is the _entire_ Bitcoin community?

Best,
Tim