1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01131899
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:36:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (mail.bluematt.me [192.241.179.72])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85923210
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [162.186.187.200] (unknown [172.56.7.62])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C31D957249;
Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:36:15 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnrmkEGHY7HwffbQ4sEG_c2EhCbVK64FtGXSERpGdsxoQZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrmkEGHY7HwffbQ4sEG_c2EhCbVK64FtGXSERpGdsxoQZA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:36:07 +0000
To: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <6938112D-77D2-44FC-8FF8-13967E9673F2@mattcorallo.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
relative locktime (Btc Drak)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:36:21 -0000
On August 13, 2015 7:34:03 PM GMT+03:00, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV and BIP68.
>If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no brainer.
>
>Was there a competing RCLTV implementation somewhere that did not
>depend on
>BIP68 for information ? I don't manage to find it.
I think all such competing proposals are dropped because this seemed like a better idea. Feel free to revive one/come up with one, though.
Matt
|
