summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/11/05154bdf6b197543bdb4aa4f3f99c5b5de2272
blob: f2126b94847316207a123fe1afcd970e54a07108 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE77F0B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com
	[209.85.213.174])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1502ED
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id to18so67967824igc.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:36:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=xz9RyMv3hNqIVMU1OMvOim602cj1r9JmZRezN+F5sj4=;
	b=m9xhj/iJnbqBxmZIDWd5tio9cuswdzWFTvQ9OS++HKiEeEKG/brNZZKnHMVzYIe77i
	fpIFWjwm+zwCY8SHYzuNOSvUGghNEtahga4zb/4KuiBpmgAp5FaH3dz1R8xKWzziWVnz
	Odw5ZU0EDu9WZ0/YSHWKRfnu6Idg7DSLH20ZgFXXmwZBzTxmjT1DsTbpfoeGrmpE4uL9
	h4lYJgzDfbNKn0sRaG1sILY4xkCTC0SbNJYKgbf60BJv8l4r+FZWwj40MDqQtogdEP0c
	VfNyU5+/Shxmh/6UqbaYK6kPoBQDhNJKS2faMFmenfsosbvBZjWfJrqP1xb23c5V09Eg
	7ENA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.185.133 with SMTP id j127mr45704846iof.91.1450301778267; 
	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.8.198 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:36:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDrQ8X70RGVmboyBzaLmd1ZJ77+-Hdr8PG153FcFJmJ29g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcasDuBsop55ZWcTb2FvccaoREg8K032rUjgQUQhQ3g=XA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBi=Mw7UnxG1-0-0ZTRqxrS5+28VmowyYrGP2MAvYiu_pA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_Wcae7OK7kyXkfh+7XFrc2WYsv7T1Va3_E=5om+XYrL9pOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDrQ8X70RGVmboyBzaLmd1ZJ77+-Hdr8PG153FcFJmJ29g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:36:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CADm_WcZncVOV_F7dGp4Xs15xgKwdixdn8wWHML8whRfR_1uNnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c070a1c4f92e705270ab27e
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size: It's economics & user preparation &
 moral hazard
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:36:19 -0000

--94eb2c070a1c4f92e705270ab27e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:

> Assuming we adopt bip102, eventually you will be able to say exactly the
> same about 2 MB. When does this "let's not change the economics" finishes
> (if ever)?
>

The question is answered in the original email.

In the short term, the risk of a Fee Event and lack of solid post-Fee-Event
economic plan implies "short term bump" reduces those risks.

It is also true - as noted in [1], a bump does create the danger of long
term moral hazard.

This is why a bump should be accompanied with at least a weak public
commitment to flexcap or a similar long term proposal, as the original
email recommended.  Communicate clearly the conditions for future change,
then iterate as needs and feedback indicate.



[1] http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf

--94eb2c070a1c4f92e705270ab27e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span di=
r=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jtimon@jtimon.cc" target=3D"_blank">jtimon@=
jtimon.cc</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D=
"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px=
 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left=
-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><p dir=3D"ltr">Assuming we adopt bip10=
2, eventually you will be able to say exactly the same about 2 MB. When doe=
s this &quot;let&#39;s not change the economics&quot; finishes (if ever)?<b=
r></p></span>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">The question is ans=
wered in the original email.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div=
 class=3D"gmail_extra">In the short term, the risk of a Fee Event and lack =
of solid post-Fee-Event economic plan implies &quot;short term bump&quot; r=
educes those risks.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D=
"gmail_extra">It is also true - as noted in [1], a bump does create the dan=
ger of long term moral hazard.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_extra">This is why a bump should be accompanied with at l=
east a weak public commitment to flexcap or a similar long term proposal, a=
s the original email recommended.=C2=A0 Communicate clearly the conditions =
for future change, then iterate as needs and feedback indicate.</div><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">[1]=C2=A0<a href=
=3D"http://gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf">http:=
//gtf.org/garzik/bitcoin/BIP100-blocksizechangeproposal.pdf</a></div><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div>

--94eb2c070a1c4f92e705270ab27e--