1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B038210FB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yk0-f174.google.com (mail-yk0-f174.google.com
[209.85.160.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B60100
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 06:35:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z13so73372186ykd.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:35:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=rgrant-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=EiDkkt9jbL93hvwLjlTnohJ0arUDehfiR8JzFbpQ0pI=;
b=Aa66WOZicLDZ1XBp5Wqmr/eVJbBPaggtjID8lN21cpApvqzZYPk6IqohLJcD9gGRsp
DPs7tmup5H2LdkXbrV2NBYFOn5mrHxuaLiQUaG3Wla8OTqQRIATHUmZFZDbyEyCu78OD
fGjIpjuXJ0gAtggv+yhCN2yM5SZERpRwznuWOe4/mXB3p2P7ccyXW1dBzGKAc/IK9P51
kLIM2z22ntzkX6lY+spY5JjyokIWSeofZ741zijTEg2b/wwobOLbA3XR3RFU5odNBjco
p7L08+2WYjwfUJh5UNirfvkmvAPil28/ZZcOlri0LAQUaHVZ2NAeSYhXSJ/yVq/1agpL
idHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject
:to:content-type;
bh=EiDkkt9jbL93hvwLjlTnohJ0arUDehfiR8JzFbpQ0pI=;
b=NuHF5ZBMZK+B/m3SC8R/lfC6AnqF2GJjEC5LuEbND/suXFZDW/Df8dxLRh+KNSNwvZ
QP5XGbn5Hi0+dmy2L9ESIH2vQpXaq7g88x3jA827tXwzwAFYRIspTCrt9n0N3xg9sR34
kqwjmAbp/aEmixO0/yZpJd78TP36lDaXLu6DM0oW+mIZ2jn7+sHTMnmgRd2PLiPsK5Nx
BMgaCXp2CAoV0/lYUtIiBamvKLBEAIr7ef1xsmzsDe/7Q6ZXIc19+rYo+ff2mwBIXzjM
N9DTXI9m6wVUPtKj9xfMU5hiCzlCm8j2viqX5WVNG/iHja2UsWFn6C4xMtgyWWKK5+gg
8+Xw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTd65t6rUV5eB8BYo4s6UIYC9Z+u87PfvihzoeZ4lRvECVndqn0/NLdCpw43X6TIMZkRDVLXiqNPmSypQ==
X-Received: by 10.37.231.69 with SMTP id e66mr16794114ybh.57.1454394937313;
Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:35:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rgrant@rgrant.org
Received: by 10.37.44.72 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 22:35:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 02:35:07 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fR2AtcHgSAiZHiUtg8roL6iLXe0
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfoOMMbZEwh3gxdRZvGHs41oRU4ueZ=xqa1R6Eog2b6UmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:27:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process: Status, comments,
and copyright licenses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 06:35:38 -0000
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Please provide any
> objections now, so I can try to address them now and enable consensus to be
> reached.
For section "Formally defining consensus",
Where objections were not deemed substantiated by the community, clear
reasoning must be offered.
For section "BIP Comments",
Comments should be solicited on the bitcoin-dev mailing list, and
summarized fairly in the wiki; with notice of summarization and time
for suggesting edits on the mailing list. Wiki registration and
monitoring should not be a required hurdle to participation.
|
