summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/0f/bcbb40522d999eb5034dc3814dd548743bbbb8
blob: 8b55a97434fae95847b86cdfdaddeaf436d0b486 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D1394C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:58:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com
	[209.85.217.170])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E9882BF
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:58:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbsx3 with SMTP id sx3so10466476lbb.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=FkHfpkUEHNaLyiVcU3A4vxAHXv6RowYu8SdHDteUlEQ=;
	b=Y/N9szW/wzgvUKSfAL5Xg0xK39GYcfxLfpYTWdax/iO+7BoHVsYsARFBr4q8iUvT+T
	yyLQkMSYUtN80VY2yk0ZgVeqDCTKb6bh6MTRSVTukn8l5j1r8uBSyIxI+i6kM7hLow4q
	mnouBM4APWazP16Ua4yvO1/++c5DGM5YYQL+j4TxcTPbxFLYA2IG2KdRqWsdHM8li5OY
	f6pT4P2nFFQYrQ7Ls1a445Vnjd7uJB/88f/ry8/ZKJGpDT4h5J8rqoh52pUWxwsxKVyP
	MbGU3bv+cpx9b21NWFoxlWpqKzAaBNc/Mw64v0xN6qLrq9TORb4NQ1RuA9UXd80VF0xa
	m8kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaYifEMWWjLaQJFwyQVIRZT2g0fkLdqgf0dYNYFHf4Y6dmumMPDsGk8fj6T0uN619ZDseb
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.42.170 with SMTP id p10mr10250913lal.39.1440014335423;
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C47D37EE-AE42-4175-AD6B-F6FD0841287B@gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTFkgGx0FxMiZ77inOZSs_+TQ88Wpj-q-c12COkO9tP4gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzv+cKPY9wrAzbk5pgQJS0=R9KWu-+EuppM=nmXs8RHxYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150819182010.GB12306@muck>
	<CADJgMzskK9iNoRzVr0BtK+XH-x2w5mGZtBiieQpwcGevnHRjGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D4D9C3.5070004@riseup.net>
	<C47D37EE-AE42-4175-AD6B-F6FD0841287B@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:58:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpAOQim63Q7r9r-Pv-K+FqizgDHNUmQ7uheGMuMt-e2QA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:58:57 -0000

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> [...]
> core devs=E2=80=9D and relying on the fact that many people out there can=
=E2=80=99t seem to
> tell the difference between a source code fork and a blockchain fork.

And this is precisely why we should make perfectly clear that we're
not against a code fork where Hearn or anyone else acts as a
"benevolent dictator", just against the controversial hardfork it is
attempting to deploy.
Otherwise the PR battle is probably lost (which may mean users sell
all their BTC for XTBTC [or just forget about their BTC and only care
about their XTBTC]).