1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87DCA1086
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:25:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
[209.85.212.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E372710C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicpl12 with SMTP id pl12so28375354wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=njUYsrx9E/3deGSJYwR1HPheRKIoLQCbvCRtb6xQYFc=;
b=JCNAfoIXMJvR0b8kxsI3ksedMLZeADMO32BHKziqlPJ5dQ+k++i8NC+h6zoOAyh6XP
pjj1I3p30cyNNcvjgKYaR00jvux8pWXHczJ4COdIBAwuOX+pTAP4jmYkFWz6Xvvu4deZ
6AtKq8Y5luULb0IOLENWJMjZSOBZeDaec5TMIz7xIHEGnV3sLHX9UiErEUqM+2HnSf99
Cb8c5CAtKtDYxOWLpG93kjBkQL0yo0KczV1s1ywZPN4jrFO+vIDIp/bIqrQLSiEfs/O9
aaRa1FHi99uuYQZkmwm7kOWEGWIy5BRn/Tc5U4gTMXkIFMcIcgs7cftf5wpcoX/jHt1N
GV6Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.121.131 with SMTP id lk3mr25266502wjb.77.1441016741384;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.211.16 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 03:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150831094939.63DB4200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <20150831084538.399E0200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
<14f831c53d6-1c38-7667@webprd-a12.mail.aol.com>
<CADJgMztLxN2ET-gs3jaqGgHGSjggVV5cBWsKP2nGwt-xZ=GQxg@mail.gmail.com>
<20150831094939.63DB4200EF@smtp.hushmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:25:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMztjheTRyXoPiWXpMXpR7ku2cuM-+DHsrrGCiWxauDiCDg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Censorship
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:25:43 -0000
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:49 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> wrote:
>>While this topic is very interesting, I do not see how it is
>>relevant to a mailing list dedicated to technical and academic debate.
>>Please can you take this discussion elsewhere.
>
> Wow. I have Deja Vu. Where have I heard recently that discussing Bitcoin split is off topic and must be stopped?.. Hm...
>
> This is the biggest issue with Bitcoin right now and you want us to move to some obscure place?
>
> Where? Reddit? Where we can't be heard? Create another list with top XT people then.
This is a technical list dedicated to technical discussions revolving
around the bitcoin protocol and related technologies. What I am saying
is your discussion topic is not relevant to the long established theme
of this list. Please have a bit of decorum and respect for people who
joined this list so they could participate in and review
technical/academic topics.
Clearly there *should* be a general bitcoin discussion list somewhere,
I don't disagree (and I have repeatedly asked for one to be created),
but regardless, this list isn't it. The flood of off topic and
non-technical posts make it almost impossible to follow any technical
proposals.
|
